Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352633›Full record

Trial reportBehavioural and cognitive psychotherapy2019

Attentional Control as a Predictor of Response to Psychological Treatment for Depression and Relapse up to 1 year After Treatment: A Pilot Cohort Study.

J E J Buckman, R Saunders, P Fearon, J Leibowitz, S Pilling

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Remission is insufficient: predictors and mechanistic models of recurrence in late-life depression.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J E J BuckmanResearch Department of Clinical,Educational and Health Psychology,University College London,Gower Street,London WC1E 6BT.
R SaundersResearch Department of Clinical,Educational and Health Psychology,University College London,Gower Street,London WC1E 6BT.
P FearonResearch Department of Clinical,Educational and Health Psychology,University College London,Gower Street,London WC1E 6BT.
J LeibowitziCope - Camden and Islington Psychological Therapies Services,Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust,St Pancras Hospital,4 St Pancras Way,London NW1 0PE.
S PillingResearch Department of Clinical,Educational and Health Psychology,University College London,Gower Street,London WC1E 6BT.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 201292/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying depressed patients unlikely to reach remission and those likely to relapse after reaching remission is of great importance, but there are few pre-treatment factors that can help clinicians predict prognosis and together these explain relatively little variance in treatment outcomes. Attentional control has shown promise in studies to date, but has not been investigated prospectively in routine clinical settings with depressed patients.

aimsThis study aimed to pilot the use of a brief self-report measure of attentional control in routine care and investigate the associations between attentional control, psychological treatment response and relapse to depression up to 1 year post-treatment.

methodDepressed patients were recruited from two primary care psychological treatment (IAPT) services and completed the Attentional Control Scale (ACS) alongside routine symptom measures at every therapy session. Participants were tracked and followed up for 1 year post-treatment.

resultsBaseline ACS scores were associated with remission and residual depressive symptoms post-treatment, and relapse within 12 months of ending treatment, all independent of pre-treatment depressive symptom severity, and the latter also independent of residual symptoms.

conclusionA self-report measure of attentional control can potentially be used to predict levels of depressive symptoms post-treatment and can contribute to predicting risk of relapse to depression in IAPT services, without affecting rates of therapy completion/drop-out or data completion of standard IAPT measures. However, this pilot study had a small overall sample size and a very small number of observed relapses, so replication in a larger study is needed before firm conclusions can be made.

Indexed as

AttentionAdultCohort StudiesDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPrognosisRecurrenceSelf ReportTime FactorsTreatment Outcomedepressionpredictorsrelapsetreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID30352633
PMCPMC6372070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.