Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352631›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

Urogenital schistosomiasis elimination in Zanzibar: accuracy of urine filtration and haematuria reagent strips for diagnosing light intensity Schistosoma haematobium infections.

Stefanie Knopp, Shaali M Ame, Jan Hattendorf, Said M Ali, Iddi S Khamis, Faki Bakar, Mwanaidi A Khamis, Bobbie Person, Fatma Kabole, David Rollinson

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. SCORE Operational Research on Moving toward Interruption of Schistosomiasis Transmission.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Epidemiology ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefanie KnoppSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. s.knopp@swisstph.ch.
Shaali M AmePublic Health Laboratory Ivo-de Carneri, P.O. Box 122, Chake-Chake, Pemba, United Republic of Tanzania.
Jan HattendorfSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstrasse 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.
Said M AliPublic Health Laboratory Ivo-de Carneri, P.O. Box 122, Chake-Chake, Pemba, United Republic of Tanzania.
Iddi S KhamisNeglected Diseases Programme, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 236, Unguja, United Republic of Tanzania.
Faki BakarPublic Health Laboratory Ivo-de Carneri, P.O. Box 122, Chake-Chake, Pemba, United Republic of Tanzania.
Mwanaidi A KhamisNeglected Diseases Programme, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 236, Unguja, United Republic of Tanzania.
Bobbie PersonSchistosomiasis Consortium for Operational Research and Evaluation, 145 Coverdell Center, The University of Georgia, 500 D.W. Brooks Drive, Athens, Georgia, 30602, USA.
Fatma KaboleNeglected Diseases Programme, Ministry of Health, P.O. Box 236, Unguja, United Republic of Tanzania.
David RollinsonWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Ministry of Health and Social Welfare · TZPublic Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri · TZNatural History Museum · GBSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1191423University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc. RR374-053/4893196University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc. RR374-053/4893206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrine filtration and microhaematuria reagent strips are basic standard diagnostic methods to detect urogenital schistosomiasis. We assessed their accuracy for the diagnosis of light intensity infections with Schistosoma haematobium as they occur in individuals living in Zanzibar, an area targeted for interruption of transmission.

methodsUrine samples were collected from children and adults in surveys conducted annually in Zanzibar from 2013 through 2016 and examined with the urine filtration method to count S. haematobium eggs and with the reagent strip test (Hemastix) to detect microhaematuria as a proxy for infection. Ten percent of the urine filtration slides were read twice. Sensitivity was calculated for reagent strips, stratified by egg counts reflecting light intensity sub-groups, and kappa statistics for the agreement of urine filtration readings.

resultsAmong the 39,207 and 18,155 urine samples examined from children and adults, respectively, 5.4% and 2.7% were S. haematobium egg-positive. A third (34.7%) and almost half (46.7%) of the egg-positive samples from children and adults, respectively, had ultra-low counts defined as 1-5 eggs per 10 ml urine. Sensitivity of the reagent strips increased significantly for each unit log10 egg count per 10 ml urine in children (odds ratio, OR: 4.7; 95% confidence interval, CI: 4.0-5.7; P < 0.0001) and adults (OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.9-3.7, P < 0.0001). Sensitivity for diagnosing ultra-light intensity infections was very low in children (50.1%; 95% CI: 46.5-53.8%) and adults (58.7%; 95% CI: 51.9-65.2%). Among the 4477 and 1566 urine filtration slides read twice from children and adults, most were correctly identified as negative or positive (kappa = 0.84 for children and kappa = 0.81 for adults). However, 294 and 75 slides had discrepant results and were positive in only one of the two readings. The majority of these discrepant slides (76.9% of children and 84.0% of adults) had counts of 1-5 eggs per 10 ml urine.

conclusionsWe found that many individuals infected with S. haematobium in Zanzibar excrete > 5 eggs per 10 ml urine. These ultra-light infections impose a major challenge for accurate diagnosis. Next-generation diagnostic tools to be used in settings where interruption of transmission is the goal should reliably detect infections with ≤ 5 eggs per 10 ml urine.

trial registrationISRCTN, ISRCTN48837681 . Registered 05 September 2012 - Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Reagent StripsAdultChildFemaleFiltrationHematuriaHumansMaleMiddle AgedParasite Egg CountSchistosomiasis haematobiaSensitivity and SpecificityTanzaniaReagent StripsControlDiagnosisEliminationMacrohaematuriaMicrohaematuriaReagent stripSchistosoma haematobiumSurveillanceUrine filtrationUrogenital schistosomiasisZanzibar

Identifiers

PMID30352631
PMCPMC6199745
OpenAlexW2896898406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.