Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352626›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2018

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) and high dose IFN-α2b in locally/regionally advanced melanoma: safety, efficacy and impact on T-cell repertoire.

Ahmad Tarhini, Yan Lin, Huang Lin, Zahra Rahman, Priyanka Vallabhaneni, Prateek Mendiratta, James F Pingpank, Matthew P Holtzman, Erik C Yusko, Julie A Rytlewski and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01608594 (Neoadjuvant Combination Biotherapy With Ipilimumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01608594 phase1completednot on this map

Neoadjuvant Combination Biotherapy With Ipilimumab (3 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg) and High Dose IFN-Α2B in Patients With Locally/Regionally Advanced/Recurrent Melanoma: a Randomized Safety, Efficacy and Biomarker Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDiwakar DavarRan2013 to 2017Enrolled30ConditionsMelanomaArmsadministration of ipilimumab10mg/kg, administration of ipilimumab 3mg/kg + HDI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neoadjuvant treatment for stage III and IV cutaneous melanoma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Locally Advanced Melanoma.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  16. Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: A Promising New Standard of Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmad TarhiniUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA. tarhina1@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3193-9702
Yan LinUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Huang LinUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Zahra RahmanUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Priyanka VallabhaneniUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Prateek MendirattaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute and Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, 9500 Euclid Ave CA6-157, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
James F PingpankUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Matthew P HoltzmanUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Erik C YuskoAdaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, USA.
Julie A RytlewskiAdaptive Biotechnologies, Seattle, USA.
Uma N M RaoUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
Robert L FerrisUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
John M KirkwoodUPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, USA.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USAdaptive Biotechnologies (United States) · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
WILD TYPE P53-BASED ADJUVANT IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SCCHNP50CA097190 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHRISTOPHER J. BAKKENIST · 2004 to 2026
$49.6M
Therapuetic Immune Targeting of EphA2 Expressed by Melanoma & Its Tumor-AssociateP50CA121973 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KIRKWOOD, JOHN MUNN · 2008 to 2018
$22.9M
Training Program in Skin Biology and CancerT32CA175294 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KIRKWOOD, JOHN MUNN · 2014 to 2018
$973k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P50 CA097190NCI NIH HHS P50 CA121973NCI NIH HHS T32 CA175294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant immunotherapy utilizing novel combinations has the potential to transform the standard of care for locally/regionally advanced melanoma. We hypothesized that neoadjuvant ipilimumab in combination with high dose IFNα2b (HDI) is safe and associated with durable pathologic complete responses (pCR).

methodsPatients with locally/regionally advanced melanoma were randomized to ipilimumab 3 or 10 mg/kg × 4 doses bracketing definitive surgery, then every 12 weeks × 4. HDI was given concurrently. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the combination with ipilimumab 3 or 10 mg/kg. The impact on T-cell fraction and clonality were investigated in tumor and blood.

resultsThirty patients (age 37-76), 15 each at 3 and 10 mg/kg, 18 male and 12 female were treated. Considering immune related adverse events (irAEs) of interest, more grade 3/4 irAEs were seen with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg versus 3 mg/kg (p = 0.042). Among 28 evaluable patients, 11 relapsed, of whom 5 died. Median follow-up for 17 patients who have not relapsed was 32 months. The radiologic preoperative response rate was 36% (95% CI, 21-54); 4 patients at ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and 6 at 10 mg/kg and 2 (at 10 mg/kg) later relapsed. The pCR was 32% (95% CI, 18-51); 5 patients at ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and 4 at 10 mg/kg and one (at 3 mg/kg) had a late relapse. In patients with pCR, T-cell fraction was significantly higher when measured in primary melanoma tumors (p = 0.033). Higher tumor T-cell clonality in primary tumor and more so following neoadjuvant therapy was significantly associated with improved relapse free survival.

conclusionsNeoadjuvant ipilimumab-HDI was relatively safe and exhibited promising tumor response rates with an associated measurable impact on T-cell fraction and clonality. Most pCRs were durable supporting the value of pCR as a primary endpoint in neoadjuvant immunotherapy trials.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01608594 . Registered 31 May 2012.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansInterferon-alphaInterferon alpha-2IpilimumabMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapySkin NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalInterferon-alphaInterferon alpha-2Interferon-alpha2bIpilimumabAnti-CTLA-4ImmunotherapyInterferonIpilimumabMelanoma

Identifiers

PMID30352626
PMCPMC6199801
OpenAlexW2896787895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.