ArticleEpigenetics & chromatin2018
DNA replication and repair kinetics of Alu, LINE-1 and satellite III genomic repetitive elements.
Article in Epigenetics & chromatin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Spatial organization and dynamics of genome replication: from forks to foci.Nucleic acids research · 2026Review
- Centromeric transposable elements and epigenetic status drive karyotypic variation in the eastern hoolock gibbon.Cell genomics · 2025Article
- Histone variant macroH2A1 regulates synchronous firing of replication origins in the inactive X chromosome.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Centromeric transposable elements and epigenetic status drive karyotypic variation in the eastern hoolock gibbon.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Repetitive Sequence Stability in Embryonic Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Developmental Changes in Genome Replication Progression in Pluripotent versus Differentiated Human Cells.Genes · 2024Article
- The impact of chromatin on double-strand break repair: Imaging tools and discoveries.DNA repair · 2024Article
- Telomeres and Their Neighbors.Genes · 2022Review
- Isoform-specific and ubiquitination dependent recruitment of Tet1 to replicating heterochromatin modulates methylcytosine oxidation.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Epigenetics, DNA damage, and aging.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2022Review
- Chimeric chromosome landscapes of human somatic cell cultures show dependence on stress and regulation of genomic repeats by CGGBP1.Oncotarget · 2022Article
- DNA polymerase zeta contributes to heterochromatin replication to prevent genome instability.The EMBO journal · 2021Article
- Article
- DeepGRP: engineering a software tool for predicting genomic repetitive elements using Recurrent Neural Networks with attention.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021Article
- Replication Stress, Genomic Instability, and Replication Timing: A Complex Relationship.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Developmental differences in genome replication program and origin activation.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- DONSON and FANCM associate with different replisomes distinguished by replication timing and chromatin domain.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Processive DNA synthesis is associated with localized decompaction of constitutive heterochromatin at the sites of DNA replication and repair.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2019Article
- Dual Role of the Alternative Reading Frame ARF Protein in Cancer.Biomolecules · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreservation of genome integrity by complete, error-free DNA duplication prior to cell division and by correct DNA damage repair is paramount for the development and maintenance of an organism. This holds true not only for protein-encoding genes, but also it applies to repetitive DNA elements, which make up more than half of the human genome. Here, we focused on the replication and repair kinetics of interspersed and tandem repetitive DNA elements.
resultsWe integrated genomic population level data with a single cell immunofluorescence in situ hybridization approach to simultaneously label replication/repair and repetitive DNA elements. We found that: (1) the euchromatic Alu element was replicated during early S-phase; (2) LINE-1, which is associated with AT-rich genomic regions, was replicated throughout S-phase, with the majority being replicated according to their particular histone marks; (3) satellite III, which constitutes pericentromeric heterochromatin, was replicated exclusively during the mid-to-late S-phase. As for the DNA double-strand break repair process, we observed that Alu elements followed the global genome repair kinetics, while LINE-1 elements repaired at a slower rate. Finally, satellite III repeats were repaired at later time points.
conclusionsWe conclude that the histone modifications in the specific repeat element predominantly determine its replication and repair timing. Thus, Alu elements, which are characterized by euchromatic chromatin features, are repaired and replicated the earliest, followed by LINE-1 elements, including more variegated eu/heterochromatic features and, lastly, satellite tandem repeats, which are homogeneously characterized by heterochromatic features and extend over megabase-long genomic regions. Altogether, this work reemphasizes the need for complementary approaches to achieve an integrated and comprehensive investigation of genomic processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.