Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352592›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Community-informed research on malaria in pregnancy in Monrovia, Liberia: a grounded theory study.

Christine K Tarr-Attia, Quique Bassat, Bondey Breeze-Barry, Dawoh Peter Lansana, Ana Meyer García-Sípido, Adelaida Sarukhan, Maria Maixenchs, Alfredo Mayor, Guillermo Martínez-Pérez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christine K Tarr-AttiaSaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia.
Quique BassatISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Bondey Breeze-BarrySaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia.
Dawoh Peter LansanaSaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia.
Ana Meyer García-SípidoNGO Juan Ciudad Foundation, Madrid, Spain.
Adelaida SarukhanISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria MaixenchsISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Alfredo MayorISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Guillermo Martínez-PérezSaint Joseph's Catholic Hospital, Tubman Boulevard, Oldest Congo Town, PO Box 10-512, 1100, Monrovia, Liberia. gmartinezgabas@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-9515
Barcelona Institute for Global Health · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESManhiça Health Research Centre · MZSt. Joseph Hospital · US

Funding

European and Developing Countries Clinical Trial Partnership EDCTP CSA-Ebola-1420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLiberia is a West African country that needs substantial investment to strengthen its National Malaria Control Programme (NMCP), which was disrupted during the 2014-2016 Ebola epidemic. As elsewhere, Liberian pregnant women are especially vulnerable to malaria. Understanding prevention and treatment-seeking behaviours among the population is crucial to strategize context-specific and women-centred actions, including locally-led malaria research, to improve women's demand, access and use of NMCP strategies against malaria in pregnancy.

methodsIn 2016, after the Ebola crisis, a qualitative inquiry was conducted in Monrovia to explore populations' insights on the aetiology, prevention and therapeutics of malaria, as well as the community and health workers' perceptions on the utility of malaria research for pregnant women. In-depth interviews and focus group discussions were conducted among pregnant women, traditional community representatives and hospital staff (n = 38), using a feminist interpretation of grounded theory.

resultsThe narratives indicate that some Liberians believed in elements other than mosquito bites as causes of malaria; many had a low malaria risk perception and disliked current effective prevention methods, such as insecticide-treated nets; and some would resort to traditional medicine and spiritual care to cure malaria. Access to clinic-based malaria care for pregnant women was reportedly hindered by lack of financial means, by unofficial user fees requested by healthcare workers, and by male partners' preference for traditional medicine. The participants suggested that malaria research in Liberia could help to design evidence-based education to change current malaria prevention, diagnostic and treatment-seeking attitudes, and to develop more acceptable prevention technologies.

conclusionPoverty, insufficient education on malaria, corruption, and poor trust in healthcare establishment are structural factors that may play a greater role than local traditional beliefs in deterring Liberians from seeking, accessing and using government-endorsed malaria control strategies. To increase access to and uptake of preventive and biomedical care by pregnant women, future malaria research must be informed by people's expressed needs and constructed meanings and values on health, ill health and healthcare.

Indexed as

PerceptionQualitative ResearchAdultCitiesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCultureFemaleGrounded TheoryHumansLiberiaMalariaMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyYoung AdultAccess to healthcareFeminist grounded theoryLiberiaMalariaPregnancyPreventionQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID30352592
PMCPMC6199789
OpenAlexW2895942383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.