Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352579›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2018

Understanding the utilization of primary health care services by Indigenous men: a systematic review.

Kootsy Canuto, Alex Brown, Gary Wittert, Stephen Harfield

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigating Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander male health and wellbeing programs and their key elements: A scoping review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kootsy CanutoWardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia. Kootsy.Canuto@sahmri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7348-4881
Alex BrownWardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.
Gary WittertFreemasons Foundation Centre for Men's Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Stephen HarfieldWardliparingga Aboriginal Research Unit, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1061242National Health and Medical Research Council National Health and Medical Research Council CRE Grant #1100302National Heart Foundation of Australia 100702Oxfam Australia Oxfam Health and Wellbeing Supporting Innovating GrantsSylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable Foundation Viertel Senior Medical Research Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men experience worse health outcomes and are the most marginalized and disadvantaged population group in Australia. Primary health care services are critical to providing both clinical and social and emotional support, however, remain underutilized by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men. This review aims to better understand the utilization of primary health care services by Indigenous men and assess the effectiveness of strategies implemented to improve utilization.

methodsA four-step search strategy was employed across four databases to find peer-reviewed publications and grey literature from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and America. The search began in March 2015 and included the following databases PubMed, CINAHL, Informit (Indigenous collection) and Embase. Additional databases and websites were also searched for grey literature, reference lists of included publications were searched for additional studies and relevant experts were consulted.

resultsThe literature search found seven articles that met the inclusion criteria; four describing three research projects, plus three expert opinion pieces. The search was unable to find published research on strategies implemented to improve primary health care utilization by Indigenous men. There is limited published research focused on the utilization of primary health care by Indigenous men. From the identified papers Indigenous men described factors impacting utilization which were categorized into three primary organizing themes; those related to health services, the attitudes of Indigenous men and knowledge. It is evident from the identified papers that improvements in Indigenous health can only occur if future programs are developed in collaboration with health services and Indigenous men to address differing requirements.

conclusionsCurrently, health systems in Australia are limited in their ability to improve the health and wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander males without such strategies. Future research should focus on evaluating the implementation of men specific utilization strategies. It is through evidence-based research that subsequent policies and programs can be made and implemented to improve Indigenous men's health.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesDatabases, FactualHumansMalePrimary Health CareAboriginalIndigenousMenPrimary health careTorres Strait islanderUtilization

Identifiers

PMID30352579
PMCPMC6199732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.