Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30352557›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2018

Predicting vitamin E and C consumption intentions and behaviors among factory workers based on protection motivation theory.

Sahar Mohammad Nabizadeh, Parvaneh Taymoori, Mohammad Saleh Hazhir, Mehra Shirazi, Daem Roshani, Behzad Shahmoradi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sahar Mohammad NabizadehEnvironmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 6618634683, Sanandaj, Iran.
Parvaneh TaymooriEnvironmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 6618634683, Sanandaj, Iran. Parvaneh.tay@gmail.com.
Mohammad Saleh HazhirDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Mehra ShiraziWomen, Gender, and Sexuality Studies, School of Language, Culture and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA.
Daem RoshaniSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran.
Behzad ShahmoradiEnvironmental Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, P.O. Box: 6618634683, Sanandaj, Iran.
Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences · IROregon State University · US

Funding

Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran 1395.70
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudy of antioxidant vitamin consumption behavior, especially in high-risk groups with high exposure to toxic metals to reduce metal toxicity, is emphasized. This study aims to examine the structural relationships between knowledge, protection motivation theory constructs, and vitamin E and C consumption behavior among cement factory workers.

methodsProtection motivation theory and food frequency questionnaires were completed by 420 factory workers. Data were subjected to structural equation modeling to examine associations between knowledge, protection motivation theory constructs, and vitamin E and C consumption behavior. Efficacy of current recommended models was also explored.

resultsStructural equation modeling showed high explained variance within the constructs of protection motivation theory for vitamin E and C consumption behavior and intention (56-76%). The overall fit of the structural models was acceptable for both vitamin E and C behavior. Knowledge, self-efficacy, response efficacy, and perceived vulnerability predicted intention, which in turn predicted vitamin consumption behavior. Significant relationships between knowledge and self-efficacy, response efficacy, perceived vulnerability, and perceived severity were also found, while self-efficacy and response efficacy showed significant relationships with vitamin E and C consumption behavior.

conclusionsConsidering that response efficacy, self-efficacy, and intention showed as strong predictors of vitamin E and C consumption behavior, specific attention should be paid to coping appraisals and intention when designing intervention plans. Additionally, establishing the predicting role of knowledge for protection motivation theory constructs and protective behaviors should be integrated into intervention programs.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntentionMotivationAdultAscorbic AcidConstruction IndustryEatingHumansMaleSelf EfficacyVitamin EAscorbic AcidVitamin EProtection motivation theoryStructural equation modelingVitamin CVitamin E

Identifiers

PMID30352557
PMCPMC6199700
OpenAlexW2896214811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.