Trial reportOphthalmology2019
A Randomized Trial of Binocular Dig Rush Game Treatment for Amblyopia in Children Aged 7 to 12 Years.
Trial report in Ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 65 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Binocular Dig Rush Game Treatment for Amblyopia
Randomized Controlled Trial of a Dichoptic Gabor Videogame Program to Improve Visual Function in Children With Amblyopia
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research hotspots and trends of amblyopia treatment from 2015 to 2025: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Pooled it
- Binocular treatment for amblyopia: a systematic review.International ophthalmology · 2024Pooled it
- Brazilian best practice guidelines for amblyopia diagnosis and management.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2024Guideline
- Computer-Assisted Visual Training in Children and Adolescents with Developmental Visual Disorders.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2023Pooled it
- Amblyopia Preferred Practice Pattern.Ophthalmology · 2023Guideline
- Efficacy of vision-based treatments for children and teens with amblyopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of interventions for amblyopia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Pooled it
- Occlusion for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Analysis of patient adherence to emerging treatment tools for improving visual functions in amblyopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of optometryPooled it
- NEIVATECH pilot study: immersive virtual reality training in older amblyopic children with non-compliance or non-response to patching.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Trial
- New treatment for amblyopia based on rules of synaptic plasticity: a randomized clinical trial.Science China. Life sciences · 2022Trial
- Barriers to successful dichoptic treatment for amblyopia in young children.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Trial
- Portable rotating grating stimulation for anisometropic amblyopia with 6 months training.Scientific reports · 2021Trial
- Effect of dichoptic video game treatment on mild amblyopia - a pilot study.Acta ophthalmologica · 2021Trial
- A randomized clinical trial of contrast increment protocols for binocular amblyopia treatment.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2020Trial
- Advances in behavioral vision training for the treatment of childhood amblyopia: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- "Look Versus See": Does Varying Fellow Eye Contrast Affect Perception of the Amblyopic Eye?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Video Game-Based Interventions for Visual Rehabilitation in Childhood Amblyopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs on Efficacy of Conventional vs. Emerging Treatments for Amblyopia.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare visual acuity (VA) improvement in children aged 7 to 12 years with amblyopia treated with a binocular iPad game plus continued spectacle correction vs. continued spectacle correction alone.
designMulticenter randomized clinical trial.
participantsOne hundred thirty-eight participants aged 7 to 12 years with amblyopia (33-72 letters, i.e., approximately 20/200 to 20/40) resulting from strabismus, anisometropia, or both. Participants were required to have at least 16 weeks of optical treatment in spectacles if needed or demonstrate no improvement in amblyopic-eye visual acuity (VA) for at least 8 weeks prior to enrollment.
methodsEligible participants (mean age 9.6 years, mean baseline VA of 59.6 letters, history of prior amblyopia treatment other than spectacles in 96%) were randomly assigned to treatment for 8 weeks with the dichoptic binocular Dig Rush iPad game (prescribed for 1 hour per day 5 days per week) plus spectacle wear if needed (n = 69) or continued spectacle correction alone if needed (n = 69).
main outcome measuresChange in amblyopic-eye VA from baseline to 4 weeks, assessed by a masked examiner.
resultsAt 4 weeks, mean amblyopic-eye VA letter score improved from baseline by 1.3 (2-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.1-2.6; 0.026 logMAR) with binocular treatment and by 1.7 (2-sided 95% CI: 0.4-3.0; 0.034 logMAR) with continued spectacle correction alone. After adjusment for baseline VA, the letter score difference between groups (binocular minus control) was -0.3 (95% CI: -2.2 to 1.5, P = 0.71, difference of -0.006 logMAR). No difference in letter scores was observed between groups when the analysis was repeated after 8 weeks of treatment (adjusted mean: -0.1, 98.3% CI: -2.4 to 2.1). For the binocular group, adherence data from the iPad indicated that slightly more than half of the participants (58% and 56%) completed >75% of prescribed treatment by the 4- and 8-week visits, respectively.
conclusionsIn children aged 7 to 12 years who have received previous treatment for amblyopia other than spectacles, there was no benefit to VA or stereoacuity from 4 or 8 weeks of treatment with the dichoptic binocular Dig Rush iPad game.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.