Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30351398›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthodontics2019

CBCT in orthodontics: a systematic review on justification of CBCT in a paediatric population prior to orthodontic treatment.

Annelore De Grauwe, Irem Ayaz, Sohaib Shujaat, Simon Dimitrov, Logan Gbadegbegnon, Bart Vande Vannet, Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthodontics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Incidental findings from cone-beam computed tomography in children and adolescents: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Three-dimensional localization of tooth germs without ionizing radiation : Proof-of-concept study using magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Annelore De GrauweOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Irem AyazOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Sohaib ShujaatOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
Simon DimitrovPrivate Practice, Thionville.
Logan GbadegbegnonPrivate Practice, Nancy, France.
Bart Vande VannetPrivate Practice, Oostende, Belgium.
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS-IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTaking into account radiation doses, safety, and protection, we highlighted the features in which cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can offer an advantage compared to the conventional two-dimensional imaging in paediatric dentistry before orthodontic treatment.

objectiveThe aim of this article was to conduct a systematic review to assess the diagnostic efficacy of CBCT in the paediatric population at a pre-orthodontic phase. SEARCH

methodsMEDLINE via PubMed was searched to identify all peer-reviewed articles potentially relevant to the review until 1 July 2018. Relevant publications were selected by two reviewers independently. SELECTION CRITERIA: The literature selection for this systematic review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was based on predetermined inclusion criteria. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were collected on overall study characteristics and examination characteristics of the selected studies. Methodological quality of the selected studies was evaluated. Original studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) tool. Thereafter, levels of evidence were obtained according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria.

resultsAs a result of the QUADAS assessment, a total of 37 articles were included in the protocol. Following a proper protocol, CBCT was regarded as a reliable tool for assessment and management of impacted canine and root fracture. It provided a better evaluation of normal and pathological condylar shape and volume. CBCT was a superior choice for pre-surgical diagnostic applications in cleft lip and/or palate over a medical computed tomography based on its lower radiation exposure, shorter investigation time, and low purchase costs.

conclusionsCBCT is justified only in those cases where conventional radiography fails to provide a correct diagnosis of pathology. Therefore, it cannot be regarded as a standard method of diagnosis. CBCT imaging may also be justified when it positively affects treatment options or provides treatment optimization. REGISTRATION: None. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None to declare.

Indexed as

OrthodonticsSpiral Cone-Beam Computed TomographyTooth, ImpactedChildCone-Beam Computed TomographyDental CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID30351398
PMCPMC6686083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.