Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30351377›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2019

Computational analysis and prediction of lysine malonylation sites by exploiting informative features in an integrative machine-learning framework.

Yanju Zhang, Ruopeng Xie, Jiawei Wang, André Leier, Tatiana T Marquez-Lago, Tatsuya Akutsu, Geoffrey I Webb, Kuo-Chen Chou, Jiangning Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Yanju ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Ruopeng XieSchool of Computer Science and Information Security, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China.
Jiawei WangInfection and Immunity Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia.
André LeierDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Tatiana T Marquez-LagoDepartment of Genetics, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA.
Tatsuya AkutsuBioinformatics Center, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 611-0011, Japan.
Geoffrey I WebbMonash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia.
Kuo-Chen ChouGordon Life Science Institute, Boston, MA 02478, USA.
Jiangning SongMonash Centre for Data Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, VIC 3800, Australia.
Guilin University of Electronic Technology · CNMonash University · AUUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging · AUKyoto University Institute for Chemical ResearchThe Gordon Life Science Institute · US

Funding

New Tricks for 'Old' Drugs: PK/PD of Polymyxin Nonantibiotic CombinationsR01AI111965 · NIAID · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI LI, JIAN · 2014 to 2018
$4.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a newly discovered post-translational modification (PTM), lysine malonylation (Kmal) regulates a myriad of cellular processes from prokaryotes to eukaryotes and has important implications in human diseases. Despite its functional significance, computational methods to accurately identify malonylation sites are still lacking and urgently needed. In particular, there is currently no comprehensive analysis and assessment of different features and machine learning (ML) methods that are required for constructing the necessary prediction models. Here, we review, analyze and compare 11 different feature encoding methods, with the goal of extracting key patterns and characteristics from residue sequences of Kmal sites. We identify optimized feature sets, with which four commonly used ML methods (random forest, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbor and logistic regression) and one recently proposed [Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM)] are trained on data from three species, namely, Escherichia coli, Mus musculus and Homo sapiens, and compared using randomized 10-fold cross-validation tests. We show that integration of the single method-based models through ensemble learning further improves the prediction performance and model robustness on the independent test. When compared to the existing state-of-the-art predictor, MaloPred, the optimal ensemble models were more accurate for all three species (AUC: 0.930, 0.923 and 0.944 for E. coli, M. musculus and H. sapiens, respectively). Using the ensemble models, we developed an accessible online predictor, kmal-sp, available at http://kmalsp.erc.monash.edu/. We hope that this comprehensive survey and the proposed strategy for building more accurate models can serve as a useful guide for inspiring future developments of computational methods for PTM site prediction, expedite the discovery of new malonylation and other PTM types and facilitate hypothesis-driven experimental validation of novel malonylated substrates and malonylation sites.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyMachine LearningAnimalsHumansLysineMalonatesLysineMalonatesmalonic acidcomputational predictionensemble learningfeature encoding methodsLight Gradient Boosting Machinelysine malonylationmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID30351377
PMCPMC6954445
OpenAlexW2888353590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.