Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30351371›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2019

Potential Role for Urine Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Whipple's Disease.

Annette Moter, Matthias Janneck, Manuel Wolters, Christof Iking-Konert, Alexandra Wiessner, Christoph Loddenkemper, Björn Hartleben, Marc Lütgehetmann, Julia Schmidt, Ulrike Langbehn and 7 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Direct Kidney Involvement byKidney international reports · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Massive Number of ExtracellularFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  9. [The rich diversity of Whipple's disease].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Annette MoterBiofilmcenter and German Consiliary Laboratory for Tropheryma whipplei, German Heart Center Berlin.
Matthias JanneckDepartment of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Manuel WoltersInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Christof Iking-KonertDepartment of Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.
Alexandra WiessnerBiofilmcenter and German Consiliary Laboratory for Tropheryma whipplei, German Heart Center Berlin.
Christoph LoddenkemperPathoTres Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pathologie, Berlin.
Björn HartlebenInstitute of Pathology, Nephropathology Section, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Marc LütgehetmannInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Julia SchmidtBiofilmcenter and German Consiliary Laboratory for Tropheryma whipplei, German Heart Center Berlin.
Ulrike LangbehnInstitute of Pathology, Nephropathology Section, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Sabrina JanssenMedical Department I, Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Anika Geelhaar-KarschMedical Department I, Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Thomas SchneiderMedical Department I, Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Verena MoosMedical Department I, Gastroenterology, Infectious Diseases and Rheumatology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Holger RohdeInstitute of Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Judith KikhneyBiofilmcenter and German Consiliary Laboratory for Tropheryma whipplei, German Heart Center Berlin.
Thorsten WiechInstitute of Pathology, Nephropathology Section, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEArkana Laboratories · USDeutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DECzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZPathodiagnostik Berlin · DEUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhipple's disease (WD) is a rare infection with Tropheryma whipplei that is fatal if untreated. Diagnosis is challenging and currently based on invasive sampling. In a case of WD diagnosed from a kidney biopsy, we observed morphologically-intact bacteria within the glomerular capsular space and tubular lumens. This raised the questions of whether renal filtration of bacteria is common in WD and whether polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing of urine might serve as a diagnostic test for WD.

methodsWe prospectively investigated urine samples of 12 newly-diagnosed and 31 treated WD patients by PCR. As controls, we investigated samples from 110 healthy volunteers and patients with excluded WD or acute gastroenteritis.

resultsOut of 12 urine samples from independent, therapy-naive WD patients, 9 were positive for T. whipplei PCR. In 3 patients, fluorescence in situ hybridization visualized T. whipplei in urine. All control samples were negative, including those of 11 healthy carriers with T. whipplei-positive stool samples. In our study, the detection of T. whipplei in the urine of untreated patients correlated in all cases with WD.

conclusionsT. whipplei is detectable by PCR in the urine of the majority of therapy-naive WD patients. With a low prevalence but far-reaching consequences upon diagnosis, invasive sampling for WD is mandatory and must be based on a strong suspicion. Urine testing could prevent patients from being undiagnosed for years. Urine may serve as a novel, easy-to-obtain specimen for guiding the initial diagnosis of WD, in particular in patients with extra-intestinal WD.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPolymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesTropherymaUrineWhipple DiseaseYoung Adultelectron microscopyfluorescence in situ hybridizationreal-time PCRTropheryma whippleiWhipple’s disease

Identifiers

PMID30351371
PMCPMC6424077
OpenAlexW2895895232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.