Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30351225›Full record

ReviewJournal of neurotrauma2019

Experimental Designs for Repeated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Challenges and Considerations.

Amanda N Bolton-Hall, W Brad Hubbard, Kathryn E Saatman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neurotrauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tissue factor release following traumatic brain injury drives thrombin generation.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amanda N Bolton-Hall1 Department of Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
W Brad Hubbard1 Department of Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
Kathryn E Saatman1 Department of Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

The role of microglia in acute pathology of repeated concussion and CTE developmentF31NS087878 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BOLTON-HALL, AMANDA · 2014 to 2015
$58k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS087878
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild traumatic brain injury (mild TBI) is a growing public concern, as evidence mounts that even brain injuries classified as "mild" can result in persistent neurological dysfunction. Multiple brain injuries heighten the likelihood of worsened or more prolonged symptomatology and may trigger long-term neurodegeneration. Animal models provide a logical platform to identify key parameters, such as loading forces, duration between injuries, and number of injuries, which contribute to additive or synergistic damage after repeated mild TBI. Despite the tremendous increase in research productivity in the field of repeated mild TBI, relatively few studies have been designed in such a way as to provide experimental-based insights into the dependence of cellular and functional outcomes on the prescribed parameters of mild TBI. In this review, we summarize how standard models of TBI have been adapted to produce mild TBI and highlight commonly observed aspects of neuropathology replicated in rodent models of mild TBI. The complexity of designing studies of repeated TBI is discussed, including challenges of incorporating appropriate control groups, informative experimental design, and relevant outcome measures. We then feature studies that provide a well-controlled, within-study design varying either the number of injuries or the interinjury interval. Harnessing the power of experimental models of TBI to elucidate which injury parameters are critical contributors to acute and chronic damage after repeated injury can further efforts at prevention and provide improved models for testing mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsHumansResearch Designaxonal injurycortexhippocampusmemory lossneuroinflammationrodent behavior

Identifiers

PMID30351225
PMCPMC6479246
OpenAlexW2896574495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.