Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30351211›Full record

ReviewMultiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)2019

The Multiple Sclerosis Care Unit.

Per Soelberg Sorensen, Gavin Giovannoni, Xavier Montalban, Christoph Thalheim, Paola Zaratin, Giancarlo Comi

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 153 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Setting up an autonomic unit within the neurological department: a position statement of the European Federation of Autonomic Societies.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Per Soelberg SorensenDanish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gavin GiovannoniBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Xavier MontalbanVall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Christoph ThalheimEuropean Multiple Sclerosis Platform, Brussels, Belgium.
Paola ZaratinItalian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Genoa, Italy/Multiple Sclerosis International Federation (MSIF), London, UK.
Giancarlo ComiDepartment of Neurology and Institute of Experimental Neurology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla · ITEuropean Platform of Women Scientists · BEQueen Mary University of London · GBRigshospitalet · DKVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ESVita-Salute San Raffaele University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has become increasingly multifaceted and comprises not only a variety of disease-modifying drugs with different mechanism of action but also a wide range of symptomatic therapies. Today, it is not possible for the family physician or even many general neurologists to master the current treatment algorithm, and this calls for the establishment of multidisciplinary MS Care Units. The core of the MS Care Unit would, in addition to MS neurologists and nurses, typically comprise neuropsychologists, clinical psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and secretaries, and will work together with a group of different specialists on formalized diagnostic workup procedures, protocols for initiation and follow-up of disease-modifying therapies. It is obvious that the terms of performance of different MS Care Units will vary across regions and need to be balanced with clinical practice according to local conditions. Although the main objective for establishment of MS Care Units will be to offer the single MS patient seamless and correct management of the disease to increase patient satisfaction and quality of life, it may even be cost-effective for the society by maintaining the working ability and reducing the costs of home help and custodial care by keeping people with MS resourceful.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePatient CareQuality of LifeCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementHumansMultiple SclerosisMultiple sclerosismultiple sclerosis caremultiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapymultiple sclerosis multidisciplinary managementmultiple sclerosis symptomatic treatmentmultiple sclerosis treatment

Identifiers

PMID30351211
PMCPMC6439947
OpenAlexW2896294018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.