Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30351183›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2019

Discordance between Documented Criteria and Documented Diagnosis of Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Department.

Martin R Cota, Anita D Moses, Neekita R Jikaria, Katie C Bittner, Ramon R Diaz-Arrastia, Lawrence L Latour, L Christine Turtzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Martin R Cota1 Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Anita D Moses1 Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Neekita R Jikaria1 Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Katie C Bittner2 Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland.
Ramon R Diaz-Arrastia3 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lawrence L Latour1 Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
L Christine Turtzo1 Stroke Diagnostics and Therapeutics Section, National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

Funding

Eval, Pathogenesis, Outcome of Subjects with or Suspected Traumatic Brain InjuryZIANS003120 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI LATOUR, LAWRENCE · 2010 to 2025
$16.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate diagnosis of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is critical to ensure that patients receive appropriate follow-up care, avoid risk of subsequent injury, and are aware of possible long-term consequences. However, diagnosis of TBI, particularly in the emergency department (ED), can be difficult because the symptoms of TBI are vague and nonspecific, and patients with suspected TBI may present with additional injuries that require immediate medical attention. We performed a retrospective chart review to evaluate accuracy of TBI diagnosis in the ED. Records of 1641 patients presenting to the ED with suspected TBI and a head computed tomography (CT) were reviewed. We found only 47% of patients meeting the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine criteria for TBI received a documented ED diagnosis of TBI in medical records. After controlling for demographic and clinical factors, patients presenting at a level I trauma center, with cause of injury other than fall, without CT findings of TBI, and without loss of consciousness were more likely to lack documented diagnosis despite meeting diagnostic criteria for TBI. A greater proportion of patients without documented ED diagnosis of TBI were discharged home compared to those with a documented diagnosis of TBI (58% vs. 40%; p < 0.001). Together, these data suggest that many patients who have sustained a TBI are discharged home from the ED without a documented diagnosis of TBI, and that improved awareness and implementation of diagnostic criteria for TBI is important in the ED and for in- and outpatient providers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrain Injuries, TraumaticEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologyRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultdiagnosisemergency departmenttraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID30351183
PMCPMC6479243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.