ArticleClinical cardiology2018
Predictors of cardiorespiratory fitness improvement in phase II cardiac rehabilitation.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and validation of a multidimensional tool for baseline functional phenotyping in cardiac rehabilitation.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Article
- Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Literature Review of Benefits, Challenges, and Emerging Approaches.Cureus · 2025Review
- Cardiac Telerehabilitation After Acute Coronary Syndrome Ensures Similar Improvement in Exercise Capacity as Inpatient Rehabilitation, Regardless of the Age Profile of the Compared Groups.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Differential associations of emotional and physical domains of the MacNew Heart with changes in 6-min walking test.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Yangxinshi Tablet Improves Exercise Capacity for Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, and Multicenter Trial.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Mediator Effect of Cardiorespiratory Fitness on the Association between Physical Activity and Lung Function in Adults: Cross-Sectional Results from the Epimov Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Predictors of completion and response to a psychological intervention to promote health behavior adherence in heart failure.International journal of psychiatry in medicine · 2022Article
- Indoor cycling training in rehabilitation of patients after myocardial infarction.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of Resistance Training with the Use of a Suspension System in Patients after Myocardial Infarction.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Predictors of cardiorespiratory fitness improvement in phase II cardiac rehabilitation.Clinical cardiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events and death. However, data about predictors of fitness improvement during CR are limited and conflicting. The objective of this study was to determine predictors of improvement in metabolic equivalents of task (METs) based on formal exercise testing throughout phase II CR.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 20 671 patients enrolled in phase II CR at our center from 2006 to 2016. Patients who completed 36 sessions and had entry and exit exercise stress tests were included for study. The short form-36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used to assess quality-of-life. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of METs improvement.
resultsOf the full cohort, 827 patients completed 36 sessions and had entry/exit stress test data. The majority of patients (N = 647, 78.2%) had improvement in METs (mean Δ 2.0 ± 1.2 METs), including patients ≥65 and < 65 years old (77% vs 79%, P = 0.46 for difference). METs improvement was negatively associated with body mass index, diabetes, left ventricular dysfunction, and poor baseline fitness; and positively associated with SF-36 score (P < 0.05 for all). After multivariable adjustment, improvement was no longer affected by age, ejection fraction, or baseline fitness. Patients with poor fitness (≤5 METS) and adequate fitness (> 5 METS) both had improvement, with no statistical difference between the groups (P = 0.36).
conclusionsIn a large cohort of phase II CR patients, improvement in CRF was seen in the majority of patients across all ages, genders, and levels of baseline fitness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.