ArticleThe Journal of pathology2019
Phenotypic and molecular dissection of metaplastic breast cancer and the prognostic implications.
Article in The Journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Characterization and Prospective Evaluation of Pathologic Response and Outcomes with Neoadjuvant Therapy in Metaplastic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022Trial
- A retrospective study of metaplastic breast cancer: Treatment and prognosis through chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy.Medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond the Triple-Negative Label: A Case Report on Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Imaging and Clinicopathological Features of Squamous Cell Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: A 22-Case Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Log odds of positive lymph nodes predicts survival in metaplastic breast cancer based on SEER analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast with multifocal gastrointestinal, ovarian, and peritoneal metastases: a case report.Journal of medical case reports · 2026Article
- Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Breast: A Case Report and Comprehensive Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
- Subtype-specific sonographic signatures and clinicopathological features of metaplastic breast cancer: a 50-case cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Activation of PI3K and deletion of p53 in keratin 15-expressing mouse mammary cells induces tumor heterogeneity and plasticity modeling metaplastic breast cancer.The Journal of pathology · 2025Article
- Integrated profiling of metaplastic breast cancer identifies putative master regulators of intratumoral heterogeneity.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast mimicking breast implant-associated squamous cell carcinoma: a challenging differential diagnosis.Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery · 2025Article
- A dramatic response to an immune checkpoint inhibitor plus chemotherapy in a patient with metastatic metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: A case report.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- A comprehensive overview of metaplastic breast cancer: Features and treatments.Cancer science · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer Subtypes: Clinicopathologic Features and Treatment Considerations.Current breast cancer reports · 2024Article
- Translational Aspects in Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma.Cancers · 2024Review
- Immunohistochemical and molecular profiles of heterogeneous components of metaplastic breast cancer: a squamous cell carcinomatous component was distinct from a spindle cell carcinomatous component.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Chemotherapy is of prognostic significance to metaplastic breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast containing three histological components: a case report.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in metaplastic breast cancer and phyllodes breast tumors.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Genetic analysis of low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast progressing to high-grade metaplastic carcinoma.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
39 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC) is relatively rare but accounts for a significant proportion of global breast cancer mortality. This group is extremely heterogeneous and by definition exhibits metaplastic change to squamous and/or mesenchymal elements, including spindle, squamous, chondroid, osseous, and rhabdomyoid features. Clinically, patients are more likely to present with large primary tumours (higher stage), distant metastases, and overall, have shorter 5-year survival compared to invasive carcinomas of no special type. The current World Health Organisation (WHO) diagnostic classification for this cancer type is based purely on morphology - the biological basis and clinical relevance of its seven sub-categories are currently unclear. By establishing the Asia-Pacific MBC (AP-MBC) Consortium, we amassed a large series of MBCs (n = 347) and analysed the mutation profile of a subset, expression of 14 breast cancer biomarkers, and clinicopathological correlates, contextualising our findings within the WHO guidelines. The most significant indicators of poor prognosis were large tumour size (T3; p = 0.004), loss of cytokeratin expression (lack of staining with pan-cytokeratin AE1/3 antibody; p = 0.007), EGFR overexpression (p = 0.01), and for 'mixed' MBC, the presence of more than three distinct morphological entities (p = 0.007). Conversely, fewer morphological components and EGFR negativity were favourable indicators. Exome sequencing of 30 cases confirmed enrichment of TP53 and PTEN mutations, and intriguingly, concurrent mutations of TP53, PTEN, and PIK3CA. Mutations in neurofibromatosis-1 (NF1) were also overrepresented [16.7% MBCs compared to ∼5% of breast cancers overall; enrichment p = 0.028; mutation significance p = 0.006 (OncodriveFM)], consistent with published case reports implicating germline NF1 mutations in MBC risk. Taken together, we propose a practically minor but clinically significant modification to the guidelines: all WHO_1 mixed-type tumours should have the number of morphologies present recorded, as a mechanism for refining prognosis, and that EGFR and pan-cytokeratin expression are important prognostic markers. Copyright © 2018 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.