ArticleInternational journal of cancer2019
Quantitative analysis of somatically acquired and constitutive uniparental disomy in gastrointestinal cancers.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The molecular cartography of malignant and benign sebaceous tumours.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Whole Exome Sequencing Study Identifies Distinct Characteristics of Transformed Small Cell Lung Cancer With EGFR Mutation Compared to De Novo Small Cell and Primary Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of MET-variant digestive tract tumors.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Review
- SNP array genomic analysis of matched pairs of brain and liver metastases in primary colorectal cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- [Research progress on uniparental disomy in cancer].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Somatically acquired uniparental disomies (aUPDs) are frequent events in solid tumors and have been associated with cancer-related genes. Studies assessing their functional consequences across several cancer types are therefore necessary. Here, we aimed at integrating aUPD profiles with the mutational status of cancer-related genes in a tumor-type specific manner. Using TCGA datasets for 1,032 gastrointestinal cancers, including colon (COAD), rectum (READ), stomach (STAD), esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), we show a non-random distribution of aUPD, suggesting the existence of a cancer-specific landscape of aUPD events. Our analysis indicates that aUPD acts as a "second hit" in Knudson's model in order to achieve biallelic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. In particular, APC, ARID1A and NOTCH1 were recurrently inactivated by the presence of homozygous mutation as a consequence of aUPD in COAD and READ, STAD and ESCC, respectively. Furthermore, while TP53 showed inactivation caused by aUPD at chromosome arm 17p across all tumor types, copy number losses at this genomic position were also frequent. By experimental and computationally inferring genome ploidy, we demonstrate that an increased number of aUPD events, both affecting the whole chromosome or segments of it, were present in highly aneuploid genomes compared to near-diploid tumors. Finally, the presence of mosaic UPD was detected at a higher frequency in DNA extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with colorectal cancer compared to healthy individuals. In summary, our study defines specific profiles of aUPD in gastrointestinal cancers and provides unequivocal evidence of their relevance in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.