Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30350221›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2019

Extinction of instrumental (operant) learning: interference, varieties of context, and mechanisms of contextual control.

Mark E Bouton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human-operant evaluation of synthesized alternative reinforcement and resurgence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Intertrial interval as a contextual stimulus in discriminated operant learning.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Separate and combined effects of operant ABA renewal mitigation strategies.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Habit and persistence.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Review
  19. The temporal structure of goal-directed and habitual operant behavior.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark E BoutonUniversity of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. Mark.Bouton@uvm.edu.
University of Vermont · US

Funding

Extinction and Recovery in Associative LearningR01DA033123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BOUTON, MARK E · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
National Institutes of Health RO1 DA033123NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews recent research on the extinction of instrumental (or operant) conditioning from the perspective that it is an example of a general retroactive interference process. Previous discussions of interference have focused primarily on findings from Pavlovian conditioning. The present review shows that extinction in instrumental learning has much in common with other examples of retroactive interference in instrumental learning (e.g., omission learning, punishment, second-outcome learning, discrimination reversal learning, and differential reinforcement of alternative behavior). In each, the original learning can be largely retained after conflicting information is learned, and behavior is cued or controlled by the current context. The review also suggests that a variety of stimuli can play the role of context, including room and apparatus cues, temporal cues, drug state, deprivation state, stress state, and recent reinforcers, discrete cues, or behaviors. In instrumental learning situations, the context can control behavior through its direct association with the reinforcer or punisher, through its hierarchical relation with response-outcome associations, or its direct association (inhibitory or excitatory) with the response. In simple instrumental extinction and habit learning, the latter mechanism may play an especially important role.

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, OperantCuesDiscrimination LearningExtinction, PsychologicalHumansReinforcement, PsychologyReversal LearningContextExtinctionInstrumental learningInterference

Identifiers

PMID30350221
PMCPMC6374202
OpenAlexW2897986552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.