ReviewHNO2018
[Update on HPV-associated head and neck cancer-highlights of the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting].
Review in HNO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising incidence rates in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) and a significantly improved prognosis have brought this entity into scientific focus. At this year's American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, 291 studies with the keyword "HPV" were presented, the majority of which were in head and neck cancer. Due to high rates of late toxicities after conventional therapy, de-intensified treatment concepts are being increasingly discussed, although data from prospective phase III studies were not presented. Retrospective data on the latest TNM staging (downstaging in many HPV-associated patients) and other risk stratification systems were presented. HPV diagnostics based solely on p16 immunohistochemistry were discussed. Many groups presented work on the HPV association and its prognostic relevance not only in oropharyngeal carcinoma, but also in oral cavity, hypopharyngeal, and locally advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. New prognostic biomarkers such as methylation signatures appear to be promising. New data suggest equal survival rates in HPV-associated stage I OPSCC treated with surgery alone in comparison to patients who received adjuvant therapy after surgery. A possible negative effect on overall survival in stage III HPV-associated OPSCC with a cisplatin dose ≤200 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.