Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30350192›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2019

The Safety of Outpatient Stoma Closure: on the Verge of a Paradigm Shift?

James P Taylor, Miloslawa Stem, Sophia Y Chen, David Yu, Sandy H Fang, Susan L Gearhart, Bashar Safar, Jonathan E Efron

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James P TaylorJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Miloslawa StemJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Sophia Y ChenJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
David YuJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Sandy H FangJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Susan L GearhartJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Bashar SafarJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Jonathan E EfronJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA. jefron1@jhmi.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn area of contention among colorectal surgeons is when it is safe to discharge patients who have undergone closure of diverting ostomies. This study aimed to review the trends in outpatient stoma closure (OSC), to assess the safety of this practice, and to identify appropriate surgical candidates for the outpatient procedure.

methodsPatients were queried from the ACS National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2005-2016). Main outcomes included Clavien-Dindo (C-D) III-V class surgical complications, and readmission. Outpatient stay was defined as a hospital stay of less than or equal to 1 day. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for C-D III-V complications and readmission.

resultsOf 24,393 patients, 668 (2.74%) underwent an OSC. OSC has increased over the last decade (3.16% 2005-2006, 4.14% 2016, p < 0.001). Outpatients had significantly lower ASA class and fewer comorbidities than inpatients. Outpatient complication rate was significantly lower than the inpatient rate (2.99% vs. 7.25%, p < 0.001). Readmissions were comparable (8.92% outpatient vs. 9.77% inpatient, p = 0.54). ASA > 2, smoking, COPD, dyspnea, steroid use, bleeding disorder, and partial/total dependency were associated with increased risk of complications and readmission. Patients without any risk factors had lower complication (4.75%) and readmission rates (8.09%) compared to those with ≥ 2 risk factors (11.50% complication and 13.07% readmission rate, p < 0.001).

conclusionsThere is an increasing trend in the percentage of stoma closures being performed as outpatient procedures. Appropriate selection of patients preoperatively who are suitable candidates for OSC can be helpful in managing patient expectations and hospital resources.

Indexed as

EnterostomyAgedAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresDatabases, FactualFemaleHealth Status IndicatorsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsElectiveIleostomyReversalStoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.