Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30350165›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2019

A reduced micro-dose protocol for 3D reconstruction of the spine in children with scoliosis: results of a phantom-based and clinically validated study using stereo-radiography.

Peter H Pedersen, Claudio Vergari, Abdulmajeed Alzakri, Raphaël Vialle, Wafa Skalli

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Halo-gravity traction followed by definitive fusion in severe early onset scoliosis: results of a trunk analysis based on biplanar 3D reconstructions.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A convolutional neural network to detect scoliosis treatment in radiographs.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter H PedersenOrthopedic Department, University Hospital of Aalborg, Hobrovej 18-22, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark. php@rn.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8475-9687
Claudio VergariArts et Metiers ParisTech, LBM/Institut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, 151 bd de l'Hopital, 75013, Paris, France.
Abdulmajeed AlzakriArts et Metiers ParisTech, LBM/Institut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, 151 bd de l'Hopital, 75013, Paris, France.
Raphaël VialleDepartment of Pediatrics, Sorbonne Université, APHP Paris, 26 avenue du Dr Arnold Netter, 75012, Paris, France.
Wafa SkalliArts et Metiers ParisTech, LBM/Institut de Biomecanique Humaine Georges Charpak, 151 bd de l'Hopital, 75013, Paris, France.
ParisTech · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to validate the reproducibility of 3D reconstructions of the spine using a new reduced micro-dose protocol.

methodsFirst, semi-quantitative image analysis was performed using an anthropomorphic child phantom undergoing low-dose biplanar radiography. This analysis was used to establish a "lowest dose" allowing for acceptable visibility of spinal landmarks. Subsequently, a group of 18 scoliotic children, 12 years of age or younger, underwent full-spine biplanar radiography with both micro-dose and the newly defined reduced micro-dose. An intra- and inter-observer reliability study of 3D reconstructions of the spine was performed according to the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)-5725 standard, with three operators.

resultsThe reduced micro-dose setting corresponded to a theoretical reduction of radiation dose exposure of approximately 58%. In vivo results showed acceptable intra- and inter-observer reliability (for instance, 3.8° uncertainty on Cobb angle), comparable to previous studies on 3D spine reconstruction reliability and reproducibility based on stereo-radiography.

conclusionA new reduced micro-dose protocol offered reliable 3D reconstructions of the spine in patients with mild scoliosis. However, the quality of 3D reconstructions from both reduced micro-dose and micro-dose was inferior to standard-dose protocol on most parameters. Standard-dose protocol remains the option of choice for most accurate assessment and 3D reconstruction of the spine. Still, this new protocol offers a preliminary screening option and a follow-up tool for children with mild scoliosis yielding extremely low radiation and could replace micro-dose protocol for these patients. KEY POINTS: • We investigated the reliability of 3D reconstructions of the spine based on a new stereo-radiography protocol reducing radiation dose by 58% compared with established micro-dose imaging protocol. • The new reduced micro-dose protocol offers a reproducible preliminary screening option and a follow-up tool in the necessarily frequent repeat imaging of children with mild scoliosis yielding extremely low radiation and could replace existing micro-dose protocol for these patients. • EOS standard-dose protocol remains the option of choice for exact radiographic assessment of scoliosis, offering more exact 3D reproducibility of the spine compared to both micro-dose and the new reduced micro-dose protocols.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageRadiostereometric AnalysisAdolescentChildClinical ProtocolsFemaleHumansMaleNeurosurgical ProceduresRadiographyReproducibility of ResultsScoliosisSpineRadiation dosageRadiographyReproducibility of resultsScoliosisThree-dimensional imaging

Identifiers

PMID30350165
OpenAlexW2898069247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.