Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30350017›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2019

Does mechanical morcellation of large glands compromise incidental prostate cancer detection on specimen analysis? A pathological comparison with open simple prostatectomy.

Vincent Misraï, Sébastien Kerever, Marie Pasquie, Benoit Bordier, Julien Guillotreau, Julien Palasse, Virginie Guillotreau, Enrique Rijo, Sébastien Vincendeau, Romain Huet and 4 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Incidental Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Open Prostatectomy Specimens: An Institutional Experience.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent MisraïDepartment of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France. v.misrai@clinique-pasteur.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2029-0650
Sébastien KereverLariboisière University Hospital, ECSTRA Team, CRESS, Epidemiology and Statistics Centre, and University Denis Diderot, Paris, France.
Marie PasquieDepartment of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.
Benoit BordierDepartment of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.
Julien GuillotreauDepartment of Urology, Clinique Pasteur, 31300, Toulouse, France.
Julien PalasseDepartment of Pathology, S.O. Path, Toulouse, France.
Virginie GuillotreauDepartment of Pathology, Les Feuillants, Toulouse, France.
Enrique RijoDepartment of Urology, Hospital Quirón Salud, Barcelona, Spain.
Sébastien VincendeauDepartment of Urology, Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France.
Romain HuetDepartment of Urology, Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France.
Romain MathieuDepartment of Urology, Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France.
Benoit PeyronnetDepartment of Urology, Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France.
Nathalie Rioux-LeclercqDepartment of Pathology, Rennes Hospital, Rennes, France.
Eva-Maria CompératDepartment of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, AP-HP, University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRClinique Pasteur · FRHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ESSorbonne Université · FRUniversité Paris Cité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study sought to compare the incidental prostate cancer (iPCa) detection rate between pathological specimens from green laser enucleation of the prostate (GreenLEP) and open simple prostatectomy (OSP). MATERIALS AND

methodsIn two institutions, the charts of all consecutive patients who underwent OSP between January 2005 and December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed, and the data of all consecutive patients who underwent GreenLEP with tissue morcellation between July 2013 and January 2018 were also collected. Preoperative demographics and pathological findings were recorded. iPCa detection rate was retrospectively compared between the GreenLEP and OSP groups in a propensity score model, including all predetermined variables: Age, preoperative PSA level and prostate volume.

resultsOf 738 patients, 402 were included in the propensity-score matching analysis, and they were equally distributed among groups. The overall iPCa detection rates were similar in both groups (9.9% vs. 8.5%; p = 0.73), and there were no statistically significant differences in terms of tumour stage, Gleason score or the rate of clinically significant iPCa, although the number of cassettes analysed was significantly higher in the morcellation group than in the OSP group. No predictive factors for iPCa were identified.

conclusionsThe results of the present study suggest that the mechanical morcellation of large glands had no influence on iPCa detection. Compared with a specimen from standard OSP, a large morcellated tissue sample allows adequate pathological evaluation and does not alter a pathologist's ability to detect iPCa.

Indexed as

Incidental FindingsAgedHumansLaser TherapyMaleMiddle AgedMorcellationNeoplasm StagingProstatectomyProstatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsTransurethral Resection of ProstateUrethral ObstructionBenign prostatic obstructionEnucleationHistologyProstate cancerProstate-specific antigen

Identifiers

PMID30350017
OpenAlexW2896471426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.