Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349971›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2018

Separate brain areas for processing human and dog faces as revealed by awake fMRI in dogs (Canis familiaris).

Andie M Thompkins, Bhavitha Ramaiahgari, Sinan Zhao, Sai Sheshan Roy Gotoor, Paul Waggoner, Thomas S Denney, Gopikrishna Deshpande, Jeffrey S Katz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Neuroanatomical asymmetry in the canine brain.Brain structure & function · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Shining new light on sensory brain activation and physiological measurement in seals using wearable optical technology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andie M ThompkinsDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Bhavitha RamaiahgariAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Sinan ZhaoAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Sai Sheshan Roy GotoorAU MRI Research Center, Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Paul WaggonerCanine Detection Research Institute, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Thomas S DenneyDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Gopikrishna DeshpandeDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA.
Jeffrey S KatzDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. katzjef@auburn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has emerged as a viable method to study the neural processing underlying cognition in awake dogs. Working dogs were presented with pictures of dog and human faces. The human faces varied in familiarity (familiar trainers and unfamiliar individuals) and emotional valence (negative, neutral, and positive). Dog faces were familiar (kennel mates) or unfamiliar. The findings revealed adjacent but separate brain areas in the left temporal cortex for processing human and dog faces in the dog brain. The human face area (HFA) and dog face area (DFA) were both parametrically modulated by valence indicating emotion was not the basis for the separation. The HFA and DFA were not influenced by familiarity. Using resting state fMRI data, functional connectivity networks (connectivity fingerprints) were compared and matched across dogs and humans. These network analyses found that the HFA mapped onto the human fusiform area and the DFA mapped onto the human superior temporal gyrus, both core areas in the human face processing system. The findings provide insight into the evolution of face processing.

Indexed as

Facial ExpressionAnimalsBrain MappingDogsFacial RecognitionFemaleFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleRecognition, PsychologyTemporal LobeWakefulnessConnectivityDog cognitionDog neuroimagingFace processingfMRI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.