Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349958›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019

The possibility of the combination of OCT and fundus images for improving the diagnostic accuracy of deep learning for age-related macular degeneration: a preliminary experiment.

Tae Keun Yoo, Joon Yul Choi, Jeong Gi Seo, Bhoopalan Ramasubramanian, Sundaramoorthy Selvaperumal, Deok Won Kim

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tae Keun YooInstitute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea. eyetaekeunyoo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0890-8614
Joon Yul ChoiDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Jeong Gi SeoInstitute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, South Korea.
Bhoopalan RamasubramanianDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Syed Ammal Engineering College, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sundaramoorthy SelvaperumalDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Syed Ammal Engineering College, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India.
Deok Won KimDepartment of Medical Engineering Seoul, South Korea, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yonsei University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, researchers have built new deep learning (DL) models using a single image modality to diagnose age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Retinal fundus and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images in clinical settings are the most important modalities investigating AMD. Whether concomitant use of fundus and OCT data in DL technique is beneficial has not been so clearly identified. This experimental analysis used OCT and fundus image data of postmortems from the Project Macula. The DL based on OCT, fundus, and combination of OCT and fundus were invented to diagnose AMD. These models consisted of pre-trained VGG-19 and transfer learning using random forest. Following the data augmentation and training process, the DL using OCT alone showed diagnostic efficiency with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.906 (95% confidence interval, 0.891-0.921) and 82.6% (81.0-84.3%) accuracy rate. The DL using fundus alone exhibited AUC of 0.914 (0.900-0.928) and 83.5% (81.8-85.0%) accuracy rate. Combined usage of the fundus with OCT increased the diagnostic power with AUC of 0.969 (0.956-0.979) and 90.5% (89.2-91.8%) accuracy rate. The Delong test showed that the DL using both OCT and fundus data outperformed the DL using OCT alone (P value < 0.001) and fundus image alone (P value < 0.001). This multimodal random forest model showed even better performance than a restricted Boltzmann machine (P value = 0.002) and deep belief network algorithms (P value = 0.042). According to Duncan's multiple range test, the multimodal methods significantly improved the performance obtained by the single-modal methods. In this preliminary study, a multimodal DL algorithm based on the combination of OCT and fundus image raised the diagnostic accuracy compared to this data alone. Future diagnostic DL needs to adopt the multimodal process to combine various types of imaging for a more precise AMD diagnosis. Graphical abstract The basic architectural structure of the tested multimodal deep learning model based on pre-trained deep convolutional neural network and random forest using the combination of OCT and fundus image.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsArea Under CurveDatabases, FactualDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFundus OculiHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMacular DegenerationNeural Networks, ComputerPhotographyReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical CoherenceAge-related macular degenerationFundus photographMultimodal deep learningOCT

Identifiers

PMID30349958
OpenAlexW2896202701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.