Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349897›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2018

A multicenter study to evaluate automated platelet aggregometry on Sysmex CS-series coagulation analyzers-preliminary findings.

Sean Platton, Áine McCormick, Musfira Bukht, David Gurney, Ian Holding, Gary W Moore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Platelet Aggregation Testing on a Routine Coagulation Analyzer: A Method Comparison Study.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean PlattonThe Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre Barts Health NHS Trust The Royal London Hospital London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-0448
Áine McCormickHaemostasis and Thrombosis Viapath Analytics St Thomas' Hospital London UK.
Musfira BukhtThe Royal London Hospital Haemophilia Centre Barts Health NHS Trust The Royal London Hospital London UK.
David GurneyHaemostasis and Thrombosis Bristol Royal Infirmary University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust Bristol UK.
Ian HoldingSysmex UK Milton Keynes UK.
Gary W MooreHaemostasis and Thrombosis Viapath Analytics St Thomas' Hospital London UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBSysmex (Japan) · JPUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesInvestigations of platelet function by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using a dedicated aggregometer is time consuming and labor intensive. This multicenter study evaluated an automated LTA method using a coagulation analyzer to establish reference ranges and ideal testing regimen.

methodsSysmex CS-2x00 series analyzers were used to measure aggregation using a range of agonists and concentrations: ADP (1-20 μM); arachidonic acid (0.5-1.5 mM); collagen (1.25-5 μg/mL); ristocetin (0.5-1.5 g/L); epinephrine (5-10 μM); TRAP (1-20 μM); U46619 (1 μM); and saline. Maximum and final aggregation, disaggregation, slope, and acquisition time were compared for each.

resultsFor 42 normal subjects there was no significant difference in aggregation parameters for: 10 μM and 20 μm ADP; 2 and 2.5 μM ADP; 1 and 1.5 mM arachidonic acid; 2.5 and 5 μg/mL collagen; 1 and 1.25 μg/mL collagen; 1.25 and 1.5 g/L ristocetin; 5 and 10 μM epinephrine; 5 and 10 μM or 20 μM TRAP. Maximum aggregation was reached by 300 seconds with 20 and 10 μM ADP, 1 μM U46619, 1 and 1.25 μg/mL collagen, 1.5 g/L ristocetin and 5, 10, and 20 μM TRAP: all others agonists required 600s.

conclusionsA standard panel of agonists can be used on the Sysmex CS-2x00 series analyzers: ADP (10, 5, 2.5, and 1.25 μM); 1 mM arachidonic acid; 1 μM U46619; 2.5 and 1.25 μg/mL collagen; 1.25 and 0.5 g/L ristocetin; 5 μM epinephrine; 5 and 10 μM TRAP; and saline. Aggregation should be observed for 600 seconds for all agonists except TRAP and U46619, which require 300 seconds. If further studies confirm these concentrations detect platelet disorders then Sysmex CS-series analyzers could replace dedicated aggregometers, or perform LTA where it is currently not available.

Indexed as

blood plateletshemostasislaboratory diagnosisplatelet aggregationstandardization

Identifiers

PMID30349897
PMCPMC6178605
OpenAlexW2889307419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.