Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349882›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2018

Impact of your results: Beyond the relative risk.

Bob Siegerink, Jessica L Rohmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Serum Calcium and Vitamin D levels: Correlation with severity of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients in Royal Hospital, Oman.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Observational
  8. Defining and measuring meditation-related adverse effects in mindfulness-based programs.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Migraine and venous thrombosis: Another important piece of the puzzle.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2019
    Article
  13. Impact of your results: Beyond the relative risk.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bob SiegerinkCenter for Stroke Research Berlin Charité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin Berlin Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8454-9142
Jessica L RohmannCenter for Stroke Research Berlin Charité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin Berlin Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2420-5716

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Universally, reporting guidelines emphasize the importance of using point estimates that indicate the strength of an effect. A single statement of the presence (or absence) of "statistical significance" and/or a

Indexed as

epidemiologyordinal outcomerelative riskstatistics

Identifiers

PMID30349882
PMCPMC6178613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.