ArticleSAGE open medicine2018
Role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses: Development and psychometric properties.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Factors Influencing Nurses' Intention and Behavior in Shared Decision-Making: A Cross-Sectional Study.The journal of nursing research : JNR · 2026Article
- Measuring readiness for nurse-led shared decision making in clinical practice: development and first testing of the RSDM-N scale.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Pioneering the IBD specialist nurse role in China: a shared decision-making model for clinical practice innovation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- [The role of nurses in shared decision-making about caring for older adults with chronic disease: A qualitative descriptive study].Journal of Korean gerontological nursing · 2023Article
- Involvement, topics, and roles of nurses in shared decision-making with patients with dementia in acute hospitals: An integrative review.Nursing open · 2023Review
- Nurses' perspective on their involvement in decision-making about life-prolonging treatments: A quantitative survey study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2022Review
- Article
- Construction of a Training Content System for New Nurses in Cancer Hospital Based on Competency.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop a scale that can measure the role competency of oncology nurses during shared decision-making process.
methodsA total of 226 oncology nurses who actively provide direct care to patients from inpatient and outpatient oncology units in the Midwest and Pacific Northwest completed the online or mail survey. Exploratory factor analysis and parallel analysis showed the multidimensionality of the role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses.
resultsThe role competency scale on shared decision-making nurses revealed four dimensions: knowledge, attitudes, communication, and adaptability. The 22 items have excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91. The four subscales also have adequate reliability with Cronbach's alpha >0.70 as well as greater than 0.70 Spearman-Brown's correlation coefficients in split-half reliability testing for each subscale.
conclusionThe new scale has the potential to be used as a clinical tool to assess the need for shared decision-making education and training in oncology nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.