Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349646›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive or prognostic factor for gastric cancer treated with nivolumab: a multicenter retrospective study.

Takatsugu Ogata, Hironaga Satake, Misato Ogata, Yukimasa Hatachi, Kentaro Inoue, Madoka Hamada, Hisateru Yasui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Takatsugu OgataDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
Hironaga SatakeCancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Shinmachi, Hirakata City, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Misato OgataDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
Yukimasa HatachiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.
Kentaro InoueDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Shinmachi, Hirakata City, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Madoka HamadaDepartment of Surgery, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Shinmachi, Hirakata City, Osaka, 573-1191, Japan.
Hisateru YasuiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo, 650-0047, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is effective as a predictive factor for lung cancer treated with nivolumab. The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of NLR for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) treated with nivolumab.

methodsThis was a multicenter, retrospective study of patients with AGC treated with nivolumab from June 2017 to December 2017. The NLRs were calculated before the first cycle (NLR

resultsTwenty-six patients were enrolled (males 19, females 7) with a median age of 64 years. The overall response rate was 15%. The median PFS was 80 days (range, 11 - 265) and the median OS was 290 days (range, 21 - 332). Stratified with high NLR (≥5) and low NLR (<5), the median PFS was shorter in the high NLR

conclusionNLR may be an effective prognostic factor in patients with AGC treated with nivolumab.

Indexed as

advanced gastric cancerneutrophil-to-lymphocyte rationivolumabpredictive factorsprognostic factors

Identifiers

PMID30349646
PMCPMC6195378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.