Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018

Plant Defensive β-Glucosidases Resist Digestion and Sustain Activity in the Gut of a Lepidopteran Herbivore.

Daniel Giddings Vassão, Natalie Wielsch, Ana Maria de Melo Moreira Gomes, Steffi Gebauer-Jung, Yvonne Hupfer, Aleš Svatoš, Jonathan Gershenzon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of aFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Fall ArmywormFrontiers in physiology · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel Giddings VassãoDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Natalie WielschResearch Group Mass Spectrometry/Proteomics, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Ana Maria de Melo Moreira GomesDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Steffi Gebauer-JungDepartment of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Yvonne HupferResearch Group Mass Spectrometry/Proteomics, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Aleš SvatošResearch Group Mass Spectrometry/Proteomics, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Jonathan GershenzonDepartment of Biochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-component activated chemical defenses are a major part of many plants' strategies to disrupt herbivory. The activation step is often the β-glucosidase-catalyzed removal of a glucose moiety from a pro-toxin, leading to an unstable and toxic aglycone. While some β-glucosidases have been well studied, several aspects of their roles

Indexed as

benzoxazinoidDIMBOAfrass proteomicsglucosinolatemyrosinaseplant two-component defenseSpodopteraβ-glucosidase

Identifiers

PMID30349548
PMCPMC6186830
OpenAlexW2895893771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.