ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018
Integrating the Local Property and Topological Structure in the Minimum Spanning Tree Brain Functional Network for Classification of Early Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classification of bipolar disorders using the multilayer modularity in dynamic minimum spanning tree from resting state fMRI.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
- Functional Connectivity Dynamics Altered of the Resting Brain in Subjective Cognitive Decline.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Special Patterns of Dynamic Brain Networks Discriminate Between Face and Non-face Processing: A Single-Trial EEG Study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Identifying Early Mild Cognitive Impairment by Multi-Modality MRI-Based Deep Learning.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Abnormalities in the brain connectivity in patients with neurodegenerative diseases, such as early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI), have been widely reported. Current research shows that the combination of multiple features of the threshold connectivity network can improve the classification accuracy of diseases. However, in the construction of the threshold connectivity network, the selection of the threshold is very important, and an unreasonable setting can seriously affect the final classification results. Recent neuroscience research suggests that the minimum spanning tree (MST) brain functional network is helpful, as it avoids the methodological biases while comparing networks. In this paper, by employing the multikernel method, we propose a framework to integrate the multiple properties of the MST brain functional network for improving the classification performance. Initially, the Kruskal algorithm was used to construct an unbiased MST brain functional network. Subsequently, the vector kernel and graph kernel were used to quantify the two different complementary properties of the network, such as the local connectivity property and the topological property. Finally, the multikernel support vector machine (SVM) was adopted to combine the two different kernels for EMCI classification. We tested the performance of our proposed method for Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ANDI) datasets. The results showed that our method achieved a significant performance improvement, with the classification accuracy of 85%. The abnormal brain regions included the right hippocampus, left parahippocampal gyrus, left posterior cingulate gyrus, middle temporal gyrus, and other regions that are known to be important in the EMCI. Our results suggested that, combining the multiple features of the MST brain functional connectivity offered a better classification performance in the EMCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.