Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349407›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology : advances and applications2018

12-month effects of incretins versus SGLT2-Inhibitors on cognitive performance and metabolic profile. A randomized clinical trial in the elderly with Type-2 diabetes mellitus.

Simone Perna, Manuela Mainardi, Paolo Astrone, Carlotta Gozzer, Anna Biava, Ruben Bacchio, Daniele Spadaccini, Sebastiano Bruno Solerte, Mariangela Rondanelli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for major neurocognitive disorders.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simone PernaDepartment of Biology, College of Science, University of Bahrain, Sakhir Campus, Kingdom of Bahrain, simoneperna@hotmail.it.
Manuela MainardiUniversity of Pavia, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Azienda di Servizi alla Persona "Istituto Santa Margherita", Pavia, Italy.
Paolo AstroneUniversity of Pavia, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Azienda di Servizi alla Persona "Istituto Santa Margherita", Pavia, Italy.
Carlotta GozzerUniversity of Pavia, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Human Nutrition, Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Azienda di Servizi alla Persona ''Istituto SantaMargherita'', Pavia, Italy.
Anna BiavaDepartment of Biology, College of Science, University of Bahrain, Sakhir Campus, Kingdom of Bahrain, simoneperna@hotmail.it.
Ruben BacchioUniversity of Pavia, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Human Nutrition, Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Azienda di Servizi alla Persona ''Istituto SantaMargherita'', Pavia, Italy.
Daniele SpadacciniUniversity of Pavia, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Section of Human Nutrition, Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Azienda di Servizi alla Persona ''Istituto SantaMargherita'', Pavia, Italy.
Sebastiano Bruno SolerteUniversity of Pavia, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Azienda di Servizi alla Persona "Istituto Santa Margherita", Pavia, Italy.
Mariangela RondanelliIRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, Unit of Human and Clinical Nutrition, University of Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia · ITUniversity of Bahrain · BH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present study is to examine the effects on cognitive performance, anthropometric measures, and metabolic markers in 2 different treatments: Incretins vs sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2-I). MATERIALS AND

methodsA randomized controlled clinical trial was carried out on 39 elderly subjects (23 men and 16 women) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, with a mean age of 77.21±8.07 years. Body mass index (BMI) of 29.92±4.31 kg/m

resultsCognitive status did not change significantly during the 12 months of treatment in either group: Verbal Fluency Test: (SGLT2-I:

conclusionPreliminary data show that patients treated with incretins and SGLT2-I have not suffered a reduction in cognitive performance during the 1 year of treatment. Metabolic outcome seemed to benefit, in particular, in patients who were treated with SGLT2-I.

Indexed as

cognitive impairmentcognitive performanceincretinsmetabolic outcomeSGLT-2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID30349407
PMCPMC6186903
OpenAlexW2896293484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.