Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349403›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2018

Factors affecting home delivery among women living in remote areas of rural Zambia: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods analysis.

Nancy A Scott, Elizabeth G Henry, Jeanette L Kaiser, Kaluba Mataka, Peter C Rockers, Rachel M Fong, Thandiwe Ngoma, Davidson H Hamer, Michelle L Munro-Kramer, Jody R Lori

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Spina bifida management in low- and middle-income countries - a comprehensive policy approach.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nancy A ScottDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, nscott@bu.edu.
Elizabeth G HenryDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, nscott@bu.edu.
Jeanette L KaiserDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, nscott@bu.edu.
Kaluba MatakaAkros Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Peter C RockersDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, nscott@bu.edu.
Rachel M FongDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, nscott@bu.edu.
Thandiwe NgomaRight to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Davidson H HamerDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA, nscott@bu.edu.
Michelle L Munro-KramerDepartment of Health Behavior & Biological Sciences, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Jody R LoriDepartment of Health Behavior & Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI USA.

Funding

Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002241 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ELLINGROD, VICKI L · 2017 to 2021
$6.9M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)KL2TR000434 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000434NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccess to skilled care and facilities with capacity to provide emergency obstetric and newborn care is critical to reducing maternal mortality. In rural areas of Zambia, 42% of women deliver at home, suggesting persistent challenges for women in seeking, reaching, and receiving quality maternity care. This study assessed the determinants of home delivery among remote women in rural Zambia.

methodsA household survey was administered to a random selection of recently delivered women living 10 km or more from their catchment area health facility in 40 sites. A subset of respondents completed an in-depth interview. Multiple regression and content analysis were used to analyze the data.

resultsThe final sample included 2,381 women, of which 240 also completed an interview. Households were a median of 12.8 km (interquartile range 10.9, 16.2) from their catchment area health facility. Although 1% of respondents intended to deliver at home, 15.3% of respondents actually delivered at home and 3.2% delivered en route to a facility. Respondents cited shorter than expected labor, limited availability and high costs of transport, distance, and costs of required supplies as reasons for not delivering at a health facility. After adjusting for confounders, women with a first pregnancy (adjusted OR [aOR]: 0.1, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.2) and who stayed at a maternity waiting home (MWH) while awaiting delivery were associated with reduced odds of home delivery (aOR 0.1, 95% CI: 0.1, 0.2). Being over 35 (aOR 1.3, 95% CI: 0.9, 1.9), never married (aOR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.2, 3.7), not completing the recommended four or more antenatal visits (aOR 2.0, 95% CI: 1.5, 2.5), and not living in districts exposed to a large-scale maternal health program (aOR 3.2, 95% CI: 2.3, 4.5) were significant predictors of home delivery. After adjusting for confounders, living nearer to the facility (9.5-10 km) was not associated with reduced odds of home delivery, though the CIs suggest a trend toward significance (aOR 0.7, 95% CI: 0.4, 1.1).

conclusionFindings highlight persistent challenges facing women living in remote areas when it comes to realizing their intentions regarding delivery location. Interventions to reduce home deliveries should potentially target not only those residing farthest away, but multigravida women, those who attend fewer antenatal visits, and those who do not utilize MWHs.

Indexed as

delivery locationdistancematernal healthmaternity waiting homemixed-methodspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30349403
PMCPMC6181475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.