Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349228›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Comparative efficacy of inhaled medications (ICS/LABA, LAMA, LAMA/LABA and SAMA) for COPD: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Mohamed Ismail Abdul Aziz, Ling Eng Tan, David Bin-Chia Wu, Fiona Pearce, Gerald Seng Wee Chua, Liang Lin, Ping-Tee Tan, Kwong Ng

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of COPD: Distinguishing Characteristics and Management of Smoking vs Never Smoking Patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Early COPD diagnosis and treatment: A case report.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Future concepts in bronchodilation for COPD: dual-European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed Ismail Abdul AzizAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
Ling Eng TanAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
David Bin-Chia WuAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
Fiona PearceAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
Gerald Seng Wee ChuaDivision of Medicine, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore.
Liang LinAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
Ping-Tee TanAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
Kwong NgAgency for Care Effectiveness, Ministry of Health, Singapore, ng_kwong_hoe@moh.gov.sg.
Ministry of Health · SGNg Teng Fong General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the comparative efficacy of short-acting muscarinic antagonists (SAMAs), long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), LAMA in combination with long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs; LAMA/LABAs) and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in combination with LABA (ICS/LABAs) for the maintenance treatment of COPD. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe systematically reviewed 74 randomized controlled trials (74,832 participants) published up to 15 November 2017, which compared any of the interventions (SAMA [ipratropium], LAMA [aclidinium, glycopyrronium, tiotropium, umeclidinium], LAMA/LABA [aclidinium/formoterol, indacaterol/glycopyrronium, tiotropium/olodaterol, umeclidinium/vilanterol] and ICS/LABA [fluticasone/vilanterol, budesonide/formoterol, salmeterol/fluticasone]) with each other or with placebo. A random-effects network meta-analysis combining direct and indirect evidence was conducted to examine the change from baseline in trough FEV

resultsInconsistency models were not statistically significant for all outcomes. LAMAs, LAMA/LABAs and ICS/LABAs led to a significantly greater improvement in trough FEV

conclusionLAMA/LABA showed the greatest improvement in trough FEV

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsAdministration, InhalationForced Expiratory VolumeHumansPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory System AgentsTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsRespiratory System Agentsanticholinergicschronic obstructive pulmonary diseasefrequentist meta-analysisindirect treatment comparisonmixed treatment comparisonmuscarinic antagonists

Identifiers

PMID30349228
PMCPMC6186767
OpenAlexW2894955927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.