Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30349179›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2018

Public attitudes toward corneal donation in northern Jordan.

Mera F Haddad, Omar F Khabour, Karem H Alzoubi, May M Bakkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mera F HaddadFaculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, mfhaddad@just.edu.jo.
Omar F KhabourFaculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, mfhaddad@just.edu.jo.
Karem H AlzoubiFaculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
May M BakkarFaculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan, mfhaddad@just.edu.jo.

Funding

The Research Ethics Education Program in JordanR25TW010026 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI AL-DELAIMY, WAEL K · 2015 to 2025
$2.5M
FIC NIH HHS R25 TW010026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aims of this study were to assess the knowledge and attitude toward corneal donation among Jordanian population and to report the reasons which may influence subject's decision and attitude toward corneal donation.

methodsA self-designed questionnaire was developed. The participants were asked about reasons for both willingness and unwillingness to donate their corneas. These reasons were stated in the questionnaire and the participants had to express their agreement by one of five options: strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, or strongly agree.

resultsA total of 500 participants (218 males and 282 females) completed the questionnaire. The average age (±SD) of the study participants was 32.8 (±11.7) years. About 67.2% of the subjects were willing to donate their corneas, whereas 32.8% were not willing to do so. The main motive for willingness was doing a good deed by helping others to see. On the other hand, fear of the body being treated badly and that other organ might be taken than the ones specified for donation were the main reasons for unwillingness to donate corneas. The age of participants, gender, and the monthly income did not significantly influence the willingness to donate (

conclusionMany Jordanians have positive attitude toward corneal donations. Ethical factors need to be addressed to promote for corneal donation. In addition, increasing the awareness of donation and its benefits may help increase the supply of corneal tissues.

Indexed as

corneal donationJordanwillingness

Identifiers

PMID30349179
PMCPMC6181474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.