ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2018
A new method for evaluating joint position sense using oral instructions based on body schema.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study investigated the efficacy of our independently developed method for measuring shoulder joint position sense using oral instructions based on body schema ("schema method") and investigated age-related changes. [Participants and Methods] Forty university students, 19 elderly individuals, and 16 elementary school students were included. Active shoulder abduction was measured in an upright sitting position. Target angles for position sense measurement were 45° of abduction (Target 45) and 90° of abduction (Target 90). The schema method consisted of indicating the target angles through oral instructions alone. The reproduction method and the imitation method were also used to measure angles. Abduction angle, absolute error, and variable error were calculated. [Results] A significant difference in abduction angle at Target 45 was observed between the schema method and the reproduction and imitation methods; no significant differences were observed at Target 90. No significant differences in variable error at Target 90 were observed among the three measurement methods. A significant difference in abduction angle was observed between university students and elderly individuals, and a significant difference in variable error was observed between elementary school students and elderly individuals. [Conclusion] Our body schema-based oral instruction method will be useful for evaluating joint position sense or proprioception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.