ArticleScientific reports2018
Evidence of a Right Ear Advantage in the absence of auditory targets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptual and Cognitive Effects of Focal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of Auditory Cortex in Tinnitus.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2025Trial
- The impact of religiosity, anxiety and depression on proneness to auditory hallucinations in healthy individuals.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Somatosensory cross-modal activation and changes in cortical somatosensory evoked potential responses in single-sided deafness: an EEG study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Investigating the effect of rTMS over the temporoparietal cortex on the Right Ear Advantage for perceived and imagined voices.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genetic and environmental contributions to gaze lateralization across social and non-social stimuli in human infants.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Hearing thresholds elevation and potential association with emotional problems among 1,914 children in Beijing, China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Editorial: Hemispheric Asymmetries in the Auditory Domain.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2022Article
- Dichotic listening performance and interhemispheric integration after administration of hydrocortisone.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Human Lateralization, Maternal Effects and Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2021Article
- A large-scale estimate on the relationship between language and motor lateralization.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Exploring the interactions among SNARC effect, finger counting direction and embodied cognition.PeerJ · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Right Ear Advantage effect (REA) was explored in a white noise speech illusion paradigm: binaural white noise (WN) could be presented i) in isolation (WN condition), ii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the left ear (LE condition), iii) overlapped to a voice pronouncing the vowel /a/ presented in the right ear (RE condition). Participants were asked to report in which ear the voice has been perceived. The voice could be female or male, and it could be presented at 4 different intensities. Participants carried out the task correctly both in LE and in RE conditions. Importantly, in the WN condition the "right ear" responses were more frequent with respect to both the chance level and the "left ear" responses. A perceptual REA was confirmed both in LE and RE conditions. Moreover, when the voice was presented at low intensities (masked by WN), it was more frequently reported in the right than in the left ear ("illusory" REA). A positive correlation emerged between perceptual and illusory REA. Potential links of the REA effects with auditory hallucinations are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.