Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348885›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: a cross-sectional study.

Katherine Maskell, Paula McDonald, Priyamvada Paudyal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessing the environment for engagement in health services: The Audit for Consumer Engagement (ACE) tool.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katherine MaskellDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health and Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Paula McDonaldSeven Dials Medical Centre, and Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton.
Priyamvada PaudyalDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health and Department of Medical Education, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth education materials (HEMs) are widely used in general practice. However, there is little information on the variety of HEMs currently available to patients in the UK, or their preferences for accessing educational materials.

aimTo assess patients' perceptions of HEMs, and the variety and accessibility of these materials. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional study conducted in general practices in Brighton and Hove.

methodAn anonymous questionnaire was distributed to patients in the waiting room (WR). Additionally, an audit was conducted to measure the variety of the HEMs. Results were analysed using binary multiple logistic regression.

resultsIn all, 556 participants (response rate 83.1%) from 19 practices took part. The mean age of participants was 49.3 years (SD ±18.9) and 63% were female. Perceived usefulness of HEMs was associated with reading in the WR using written HEMs, and not having a university degree; noticeability was associated with reading in the WR, and being female; attractiveness was associated with not having a university degree and shorter waiting time. On average, WRs contained 72 posters covering 23 topics, and 53 leaflets covering 24 topics, with many outdated and poorly presented materials of limited accessibility.

conclusionThis study found substantial variation in the amount, topicality, and quality of material available in WRs. As most patients notice HEMs and find them useful, available technology could be better utilised to widen access to HEMs. The introduction of wireless free internet (Wi-Fi) to waiting rooms should provide an opportunity to update this area.

Indexed as

Consumer Health InformationGeneral PracticeHealth PromotionPamphletsTelevisionAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth LiteracyHumansInformation DisseminationMaleMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPatient Education as TopicSurveys and Questionnairesgeneral practicehealth educationpatient educationpatient informationwaiting room

Identifiers

PMID30348885
PMCPMC6255223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.