Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348867›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Trophic rewilding as a climate change mitigation strategy?

Joris P G M Cromsigt, Mariska Te Beest, Graham I H Kerley, Marietjie Landman, Elizabeth le Roux, Felisa A Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Loss of grazing by large mammalian herbivores can destabilize the soil carbon pool.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  13. Carcass and Offal Yields of Farmed Common Eland (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  14. Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Introduced herbivores restore Late Pleistocene ecological functions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  20. Trophic rewilding presents regionally specific opportunities for mitigating climate change.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Joris P G M CromsigtDepartment of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå 901 83, Sweden joris.cromsigt@slu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-9469
Mariska Te BeestEnvironmental Sciences, Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Graham I H KerleyCentre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-2702-5200
Marietjie LandmanCentre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa.
Elizabeth le RouxCentre for African Conservation Ecology, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela University, PO Box 77000, Port Elizabeth 6031, South Africa.
Felisa A SmithDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The loss of megafauna at the terminal Pleistocene has been linked to a wide range of Earth-system-level changes, such as altered greenhouse gas budgets, fire regimes and biome-level vegetation changes. Given these influences and feedbacks, might part of the solution for mitigating anthropogenic climate change lie in the restoration of extant megafauna to ecosystems? Here, we explore the potential role of trophic rewilding on Earth's climate system. We first provide a novel synthesis of the various ways that megafauna interact with the major drivers of anthropogenic climate change, including greenhouse gas storage and emission, aerosols and albedo. We then explore the role of rewilding as a mitigation tool at two scales: (i) current and near-future opportunities for national or regional climate change mitigation portfolios, and (ii) more radical opportunities at the global scale. Finally, we identify major knowledge gaps that complicate the complete characterization of rewilding as a climate change mitigation strategy. Our perspective is urgent since we are losing the Earth's last remaining megafauna, and with it a potential option to address climate change.This article is part of the theme issue 'Trophic rewilding: consequences for ecosystems under global change'.

Indexed as

Climate ChangeEcosystemHerbivoryAnimalsBiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesFood ChainMammalsconservationEarth systemecosystem functionlarge herbivores and carnivoresmegafaunamegaherbivores

Identifiers

PMID30348867
PMCPMC6231077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.