Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348626›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2018

Group-Personalized Regression Models for Predicting Mental Health Scores From Objective Mobile Phone Data Streams: Observational Study.

Niclas Palmius, Kate E A Saunders, Oliver Carr, John R Geddes, Guy M Goodwin, Maarten De Vos

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Connected Mental Health: Systematic Mapping Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Niclas PalmiusInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-2766-3309
Kate E A SaundersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3448-9927
Oliver CarrInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1669-1005
John R GeddesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5281-5960
Guy M GoodwinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1426-2816
Maarten De VosInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3482-5145

Funding

Wellcome Trust 098461/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObjective behavioral markers of mental illness, often recorded through smartphones or wearable devices, have the potential to transform how mental health services are delivered and to help users monitor their own health. Linking objective markers to illness is commonly performed using population-level models, which assume that everyone is the same. The reality is that there are large levels of natural interindividual variability, both in terms of response to illness and in usual behavioral patterns, as well as intraindividual variability that these models do not consider.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to demonstrate the utility of splitting the population into subsets of individuals that exhibit similar relationships between their objective markers and their mental states. Using these subsets, "group-personalized" models can be built for individuals based on other individuals to whom they are most similar.

methodsWe collected geolocation data from 59 participants who were part of the Automated Monitoring of Symptom Severity study at the University of Oxford. This was an observational data collection study. Participants were diagnosed with bipolar disorder (n=20); borderline personality disorder (n=17); or were healthy controls (n=22). Geolocation data were collected using a custom Android app installed on participants' smartphones, and participants weekly reported their symptoms of depression using the 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology questionnaire. Population-level models were built to estimate levels of depression using features derived from the geolocation data recorded from participants, and it was hypothesized that results could be improved by splitting individuals into subgroups with similar relationships between their behavioral features and depressive symptoms. We developed a new model using a Dirichlet process prior for splitting individuals into groups, with a Bayesian Lasso model in each group to link behavioral features with mental illness. The result is a model for each individual that incorporates information from other similar individuals to augment the limited training data available.

resultsThe new group-personalized regression model showed a significant improvement over population-level models in predicting mental health severity (P<.001). Analysis of subgroups showed that different groups were characterized by different features derived from raw geolocation data.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the importance of handling interindividual variability when developing models of mental illness. Population-level models do not capture nuances in how different individuals respond to illness, and the group-personalized model demonstrates a potential way to overcome these limitations when estimating mental state from objective behavioral features.

Indexed as

AdultCell PhoneData CollectionFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthResearch DesignSurveys and Questionnairesbehavioral featuresdepressiongeolocationgroup-personalized modelinterindividual variabilitymental healthmental illnessobjective behavioral markers

Identifiers

PMID30348626
PMCPMC6231780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.