Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348619›Full record

ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2019

Fluoropyrimidine Cardiotoxicity: Time for a Contemporaneous Appraisal.

Jenica N Upshaw, Anne O'Neill, Joseph R Carver, Eileen P Dimond, Crystal S Denlinger, Sheetal M Kircher, Lynne I Wagner, Bonnie Ky, Joanna M Brell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Acute myocardial infarction following 5-fluorouracil treatment.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Cardioprotection of High-Risk Individuals.Heart failure clinics · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The Role of Biomarkers to Evaluate Cardiotoxicity.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020
    Review
  19. In Reply.The oncologist · 2020
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenica N UpshawDepartment of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA. Electronic address: jupshaw@tuftsmedicalcenter.org.
Anne O'NeillDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute- Eastern Cooperative Group Cancer Research Group - American College of Radiology Imaging Network, Boston, MA.
Joseph R CarverAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Eileen P DimondDivision of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Crystal S DenlingerDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Sheetal M KircherNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Lynne I WagnerWake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, NC.
Bonnie KyAbramson Cancer Center, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Penn Cardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Joanna M BrellDivision Hematology/Oncology Case, Department of Medicine, MetroHealth Cancer Center, Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.

Funding

ECOG-ACRIN NCORP Research Base - TMISTUG1CA189828 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$199.7M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center NCTN Lead Academic Participating SiteUG1CA233234 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Aaron Thomas Gerds, Daniel Eidelberg Spratt · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
CWRU Case Comprehensive Cancer Center NCTN Lead Academic Participating SiteU10CA180853 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GERDS, AARON THOMAS, MACHTAY, MITCHELL · 2014 to 2018
$6.2M
Northwestern University Lead Academic Participating Site Supplement Year 2UG1CA233320 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSON, AL B, MATEI, DANIELA E · 2019 to 2025
$5.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180853NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189828NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233234NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFluoropyrimidines (FPDs) are a fundamental component of many chemotherapy regimens. Cardiotoxic adverse events (AEs) such as angina, ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine (CAPE) have been sparingly described in studies, primarily through case reports. Data from the 1990s revealed an estimated incidence of 0.5% to 19%, with cardiovascular fatalities occurring in ≤28%. The current use of FPDs includes multiple dosing regimens, oral or intravenous delivery, and administration with additional cardiotoxic therapies. As such, it is imperative to better define the cardiotoxicity risk in the modern treatment era. We comprehensively evaluated the incidence, prevalence, and ascertainment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease within ECOG-ACRIN (Eastern Cooperative Group Cancer Research Group - American College of Radiology Imaging Network) Cancer Research Group clinical trials incorporating 5-FU and CAPE. MATERIALS AND

methodsCase report forms and clinical study reports from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group database of phase II and III clinical trials incorporating 5-FU and CAPE were evaluated. A total of 16 trials from 2002 to 2017 were identified that had used bolus 5-FU (n = 1), continuous infusion 5-FU (n = 10) or CAPE (n = 5).

resultsA history of cardiovascular disease was variably defined and was an exclusion criterion in 13 of the 16 studies (81%). The baseline risk factors and history of cardiac disease were specifically collected in only 3 studies (19%). All studies collected cardiovascular AEs using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version available at the time of the study. Fewer than half (7 of 16; 44%) of the study case report forms had also specifically requested information on cardiac ischemia/infarction. In the 12 completed studies with clinical study reports, the following AEs were reported: dyspnea, ≤16%; arrhythmias, ≤6%; and angina, ischemia, and elevated troponin, ≤5%. Some trials only recorded cardiac AEs that were possibly associated with the novel drug being studied and not those attributed to the standard of care in the 5-FU/CAPE arm, further decreasing the numerical incidence.

conclusionInconsistent clinical trial reporting of cardiac AEs precluded accurate and precise delineation of the epidemiology of FPD-related cardiovascular AEs. Prospective knowledge of the definition and natural history will lead to the development of risk factor stratification and prechemotherapy interventions to reduce or prevent cardiotoxicity. We propose that the prospective collection of baseline cardiac data and prespecified cardiac endpoints are necessary to fully understand the incidence and cardiac risk of FDPs.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCapecitabineCardiotoxicityClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicFluorouracilFollow-Up StudiesHeart DiseasesHumansIncidenceNeoplasmsPrognosisUnited StatesCapecitabineFluorouracil5-FluorouracilAcute coronary syndromeCapecitabineCardiac risk factorsChest pain

Identifiers

PMID30348619
PMCPMC6927029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.