ArticleClinical colorectal cancer2019
Fluoropyrimidine Cardiotoxicity: Time for a Contemporaneous Appraisal.
Article in Clinical colorectal cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidimensional perspectives on cancer therapy-induced cardiotoxicity: Characteristics, mechanisms, biomarkers, psychological stress effects, and treatment progress.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2026Review
- Unmasking 5-fluorouracil cardiotoxicity: The clinical utility of dynamic myocardial CT perfusion: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Navigating Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Treatment: Insights into Fluoropyrimidine-induced Cardiac Events.Current cardiology reviews · 2026Review
- Risk of myocardial infarction following capecitabine treatment in patients with gastrointestinal cancer - a nationwide registry-based study.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy and the Risk of Death and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer.JACC. CardioOncology · 2025Article
- Cardiovascular Considerations During Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence andJACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
- Acute myocardial infarction following 5-fluorouracil treatment.Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC · 2023Article
- Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cardioprotection of High-Risk Individuals.Heart failure clinics · 2022Review
- Fluoropyrimidine Cardiotoxicity: Incidence, Outcomes, and Safety of Rechallenge.Current oncology reports · 2022Review
- Cardiotoxicity from Capecitabine Chemotherapy: Prospective Study of Incidence at Rest and During Physical Exercise.The oncologist · 2022Article
- Managing 5FU Cardiotoxicity in Colorectal Cancer Treatment.Cancer management and research · 2022Review
- Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Patients Treated With 5-Fluorouracil: Balancing the Evidence With Black Boxes.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
- Cardiotoxicity of Fluoropyrimidines: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- The Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes With 5-Fluorouracil-Associated Coronary Vasospasm.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
- 5-Fluorouracil Cardiotoxicity: Known But Unknown.JACC. CardioOncology · 2021Article
- 5-FU Cardiotoxicity: Vasospasm, Myocarditis, and Sudden Death.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- The Role of Biomarkers to Evaluate Cardiotoxicity.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- In Reply.The oncologist · 2020Article
- Cardioprotective Strategies to Prevent Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity: a Review.Current oncology reports · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFluoropyrimidines (FPDs) are a fundamental component of many chemotherapy regimens. Cardiotoxic adverse events (AEs) such as angina, ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiomyopathy associated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine (CAPE) have been sparingly described in studies, primarily through case reports. Data from the 1990s revealed an estimated incidence of 0.5% to 19%, with cardiovascular fatalities occurring in ≤28%. The current use of FPDs includes multiple dosing regimens, oral or intravenous delivery, and administration with additional cardiotoxic therapies. As such, it is imperative to better define the cardiotoxicity risk in the modern treatment era. We comprehensively evaluated the incidence, prevalence, and ascertainment of cardiovascular risk factors and disease within ECOG-ACRIN (Eastern Cooperative Group Cancer Research Group - American College of Radiology Imaging Network) Cancer Research Group clinical trials incorporating 5-FU and CAPE. MATERIALS AND
methodsCase report forms and clinical study reports from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group database of phase II and III clinical trials incorporating 5-FU and CAPE were evaluated. A total of 16 trials from 2002 to 2017 were identified that had used bolus 5-FU (n = 1), continuous infusion 5-FU (n = 10) or CAPE (n = 5).
resultsA history of cardiovascular disease was variably defined and was an exclusion criterion in 13 of the 16 studies (81%). The baseline risk factors and history of cardiac disease were specifically collected in only 3 studies (19%). All studies collected cardiovascular AEs using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version available at the time of the study. Fewer than half (7 of 16; 44%) of the study case report forms had also specifically requested information on cardiac ischemia/infarction. In the 12 completed studies with clinical study reports, the following AEs were reported: dyspnea, ≤16%; arrhythmias, ≤6%; and angina, ischemia, and elevated troponin, ≤5%. Some trials only recorded cardiac AEs that were possibly associated with the novel drug being studied and not those attributed to the standard of care in the 5-FU/CAPE arm, further decreasing the numerical incidence.
conclusionInconsistent clinical trial reporting of cardiac AEs precluded accurate and precise delineation of the epidemiology of FPD-related cardiovascular AEs. Prospective knowledge of the definition and natural history will lead to the development of risk factor stratification and prechemotherapy interventions to reduce or prevent cardiotoxicity. We propose that the prospective collection of baseline cardiac data and prespecified cardiac endpoints are necessary to fully understand the incidence and cardiac risk of FDPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.