Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348216›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2018

Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study.

Asim Amin, Elizabeth R Plimack, Marc S Ernstoff, Lionel D Lewis, Todd M Bauer, David F McDermott, Michael Carducci, Christian Kollmannsberger, Brian I Rini, Daniel Y C Heng and 6 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01472081 (A Phase 1 Study of Nivolumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01472081 phase1completednot on this map

A Phase 1 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) Plus Sunitinib, Pazopanib or Ipilimumab in Subjects With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorBristol-Myers SquibbRan2012 to 2021Enrolled194ConditionsRenal Cell Carcinoma, Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell CarcinomaArmsNivolumab, Pazopanib, Sunitinib, Ipilimumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Phase Ib/II Clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab With Bevacizumab for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: BTCRC-GU14-003.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Asim AminImmunotherapy program, Levine Cancer Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System, 1024 Morehead Medical Drive, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA. Asim.Amin@carolinashealthcare.org.
Elizabeth R PlimackDivision of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Department of Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
Marc S ErnstoffDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Lionel D LewisDepartment of Medicine at The Geisel School of Medicine and The Norris Cotton Cancer Center at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA.
Todd M BauerSarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN, 37203, USA.
David F McDermottDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Michael CarducciDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Christian KollmannsbergerDivision of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Brian I RiniLerner College of Medicine, Department of Hematology and Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Daniel Y C HengDepartment of Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4N2, Canada.
Jennifer KnoxCancer Clinical Research Unit (CCRU), Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, M5G 1Z5, Canada.
Martin H VossDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Jennifer SpratlinDepartment of Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Elmer BerghornOncology - Global Clinical Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 08541, USA.
Lingfeng YangOncology - Global Clinical Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, 08541, USA.
Hans J HammersDepartment of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern - Kidney Cancer Program, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCombination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs has shown encouraging preliminary antitumor activity across various tumor types including advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). The open-label, parallel-cohort, dose-escalation, phase I CheckMate 016 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in combination with antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors or ipilimumab. Long-term outcomes from this study for the combination of nivolumab plus sunitinib or pazopanib in aRCC are presented.

methodsPatients with aRCC received nivolumab plus either sunitinib (50 mg/day, 4 weeks on/2 weeks off; N + S) or pazopanib (800 mg/day; N + P) until progression/unacceptable toxicity. The nivolumab starting dose was 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, with planned escalation to 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability; antitumor activity was a secondary endpoint.

resultsArm N + S enrolled 33 patients, 19 of whom were treatment-naïve; this arm advanced to the expansion phase. Median follow-up was 50.0 months. Patients experienced high frequencies of adverse events (AEs) including treatment-related AEs (100%), grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (82%), and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation (39%). Investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 55% (18/33) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.7 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Arm N + P enrolled 20 patients, all had ≥1 prior systemic therapy; this arm was closed due to dose-limiting toxicities and did not proceed to expansion. Median follow-up was 27.1 months. Patients treated with N + P experienced high frequencies of AEs including treatment-related AEs (100%), grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (70%), and treatment-related AEs leading to discontinuation (25%). Investigator-assessed ORR was 45% (9/20) and median PFS was 7.2 months. Median OS was 27.9 months.

conclusionsThe addition of standard doses of sunitinib or pazopanib to nivolumab resulted in a high incidence of high-grade toxicities limiting future development of either combination regimen. While there was no adverse impact on response and the OS outcome was notable, the findings suggest that the success of combination regimens based on immune checkpoint inhibitors and antiangiogenic drugs may be dependent on careful selection of the antiangiogenic component and dose.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01472081 . Registered 16 November 2011.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Renal CellFemaleHumansIndazolesKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibIndazolesNivolumabpazopanibPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibAntiangiogenicImmune checkpoint inhibitorMetastatic renal cell carcinomaNivolumabPazopanibSunitinibTyrosine kinase inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID30348216
PMCPMC6196426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.