Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348199›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Tumor-derived granulocyte colony-stimulating factor diminishes efficacy of breast tumor cell vaccines.

Sruthi Ravindranathan, Khue G Nguyen, Samantha L Kurtz, Haven N Frazier, Sean G Smith, Bhanu Prasanth Koppolu, Narasimhan Rajaram, David A Zaharoff

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Increased blood CSF3RAmerican journal of cancer research · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Intratumoral delivery of brachytherapy and immunotherapy by a thermally triggered polypeptide depot.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sruthi RavindranathanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Khue G NguyenCell and Molecular Biology Program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Samantha L KurtzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Haven N FrazierHonors College, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Sean G SmithDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Bhanu Prasanth KoppoluDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Narasimhan RajaramDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
David A ZaharoffDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA. dazaharo@ncsu.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6885-6727
University of Arkansas at Fayetteville · USNorth Carolina State University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Biopolymer-based strategies for local delivery of cytokine therapeuticsR01CA172631 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI ZAHAROFF, DAVID · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
Intravesical Chitosan/IL-12 Immunotherapy for Bladder CarcinomaR15CA176648 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI ZAHAROFF, DAVID · 2014 to 2014
$417k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172631NCI NIH HHS R15 CA176648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough metastasis is ultimately responsible for about 90% of breast cancer mortality, the vast majority of breast-cancer-related deaths are due to progressive recurrences from non-metastatic disease. Current adjuvant therapies are unable to prevent progressive recurrences for a significant fraction of patients with breast cancer. Autologous tumor cell vaccines (ATCVs) are a safe and potentially useful strategy to prevent breast cancer recurrence, in a personalized and patient-specific manner, following standard-of-care tumor resection. Given the high intra-patient and inter-patient heterogeneity in breast cancer, it is important to understand which factors influence the immunogenicity of breast tumor cells in order to maximize ATCV effectiveness.

methodsThe relative immunogenicity of two murine breast carcinomas, 4T1 and EMT6, were compared in a prophylactic vaccination-tumor challenge model. Differences in cell surface expression of antigen-presentation-related and costimulatory molecules were compared along with immunosuppressive cytokine production. CRISPR/Cas9 technology was used to modulate tumor-derived cytokine secretion. The impacts of cytokine deletion on splenomegaly, myeloid-derived suppressor cell (MDSC) accumulation and ATCV immunogenicity were assessed.

resultsMice vaccinated with an EMT6 vaccine exhibited significantly greater protective immunity than mice vaccinated with a 4T1 vaccine. Hybrid vaccination studies revealed that the 4T1 vaccination induced both local and systemic immune impairments. Although there were significant differences between EMT6 and 4T1 in the expression of costimulatory molecules, major disparities in the secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines likely accounts for differences in immunogenicity between the cell lines. Ablation of one cytokine in particular, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), reversed MDSC accumulation and splenomegaly in the 4T1 model. Furthermore, G-CSF inhibition enhanced the immunogenicity of a 4T1-based vaccine to the extent that all vaccinated mice developed complete protective immunity.

conclusionsBreast cancer cells that express high levels of G-CSF have the potential to diminish or abrogate the efficacy of breast cancer ATCVs. Fortunately, this study demonstrates that genetic ablation of immunosuppressive cytokines, such as G-CSF, can enhance the immunogenicity of breast cancer cell-based vaccines. Strategies that combine inhibition of immunosuppressive factors with immune stimulatory co-formulations already under development may help ATCVs reach their full potential.

Indexed as

Immunogenicity, VaccineAnimalsBreastBreast NeoplasmsCancer VaccinesCell Line, TumorCRISPR-Cas SystemsDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGene DeletionGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTreatment OutcomeCancer VaccinesGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorAutologous tumor cell vaccineBreast cancer immunogenicityBreast cancer vaccineMDSCs

Identifiers

PMID30348199
PMCPMC6198508
OpenAlexW2897280620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.