Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348163›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kB ligand, osteoprotegerin, and risk of death following a breast cancer diagnosis: results from the EPIC cohort.

Danja Sarink, Helena Schock, Theron Johnson, Jenny Chang-Claude, Kim Overvad, Anja Olsen, Anne Tjønneland, Patrick Arveux, Agnès Fournier, Marina Kvaskoff and 25 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. RANKL and RANK in extracellular vesicles: surprising new players in bone remodeling.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Danja SarinkDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Helena SchockDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Theron JohnsonDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jenny Chang-ClaudeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Kim OvervadSection for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anja OlsenDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne TjønnelandDanish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Patrick ArveuxBreast and Gynaecologic Cancer Registry of Côte d'Or, Georges-François Leclerc Comprehensive Cancer Care Centre, Dijon, France.
Agnès FournierUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France.
Marina KvaskoffUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France.
Heiner BoeingDepartment of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Nuthetal, Germany.
Anna KarakatsaniHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Antonia TrichopoulouHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Carlo La VecchiaHellenic Health Foundation, Athens, Greece.
Giovanna MasalaCancer Risk Factors and Life-Style Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Research and Prevention Institute - ISP, Florence, Italy.
Claudia AgnoliEpidemiology and Prevention Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Salvatore PanicoDipartimento di Medicine Clinica e Chirurgia, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Rosario TuminoCancer Registry and Histopathology Department, "Civic M.P.Arezzo" Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Provinciale, Ragusa, Italy.
Carlotta SacerdoteUnit of Cancer Epidemiology, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital and Center for Cancer Prevention (CPO), Turin, Italy.
Carla H van GilsDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Petra H M PeetersDepartment of Epidemiology, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Elisabete WeiderpassDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Antonio AgudoUnit of Nutrition and Cancer, Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology-IDIBELL, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Rodríguez-BarrancoEscuela Andaluza de Salud Pública. Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Hospitales Universitarios de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
José María HuertaCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Eva ArdanazCIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain.
Leire GilPublic Health Division of Gipuzkoa, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, San Sebastian, Spain.
Kay Tee KawCancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Julie A SchmidtCancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Laure DossusInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Mathilde HisInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Dagfinn AuneDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Elio RiboliDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rudolf KaaksDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Renée T FortnerDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. r.fortner@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1426-8505
German Cancer Research Center · DEUniversité Paris-Sud · FRCentre international de recherche sur le cancer · FRDanish Cancer Society · DKImperial College London · GBNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLAarhus University · DKBiogipuzkoa Health Research Institute · ESFederico II University Hospital · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITGerman Institute of Human Nutrition · DEInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra · ESInstituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITPrevention Institute · USUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14136Cancer Research UK 16491Cancer Research UK C570/A16491Cancer Research UK C8221/A19170European Research Council 2009-AdG 232997Medical Research Council 1000143Medical Research Council MR/M012190Medical Research Council MR/M012190/1World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundReceptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK)-signaling is involved in tumor growth and spread in experimental models. Binding of RANK ligand (RANKL) to RANK activates signaling, which is inhibited by osteoprotegerin (OPG). We have previously shown that circulating soluble RANKL (sRANKL) and OPG are associated with breast cancer risk. Here we extend these findings to provide the first data on pre-diagnosis concentrations of sRANKL and OPG and risk of breast cancer-specific and overall mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis.

methodsTwo thousand six pre- and postmenopausal women with incident invasive breast cancer (1620 (81%) with ER+ disease) participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort were followed-up for mortality. Pre-diagnosis concentrations of sRANKL and OPG were quantified in baseline serum samples using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electrochemiluminescent assay, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for breast cancer-specific and overall mortality were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

resultsEspecially in women with ER+ disease, higher circulating OPG concentrations were associated with higher risk of breast cancer-specific (quintile 5 vs 1 HR 1.77 [CI 1.03, 3.04]; p

conclusionsHigh pre-diagnosis endogenous concentrations of OPG, the decoy receptor for RANKL, were associated with increased risk of death after a breast cancer diagnosis, especially in those with ER+ disease. These results need to be confirmed in well-characterized patient cohorts.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionMiddle AgedOsteoprotegerinPrognosisRANK LigandRiskOsteoprotegerinRANK LigandBreast cancerEpidemiologyReproductive, hormonal, and related factorsSerum biomarkers of endogenous exposures

Identifiers

PMID30348163
PMCPMC6196438
OpenAlexW2897706418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.