Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30348162›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2018

Combination of PURE-DNA extraction and LAMP-DNA amplification methods for accurate malaria diagnosis on dried blood spots.

Jeanne Perpétue Vincent, Kanako Komaki-Yasuda, Moritoshi Iwagami, Satoru Kawai, Shigeyuki Kano

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeanne Perpétue VincentDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Malaria, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
Kanako Komaki-YasudaDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Malaria, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
Moritoshi IwagamiDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Malaria, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan.
Satoru KawaiDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, 321-0293, Japan.
Shigeyuki KanoDepartment of Tropical Medicine and Malaria, Research Institute, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, 162-8655, Japan. kano@ri.ncgm.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-4955

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalaria is one of the most important parasitic infectious diseases for which almost half of the world's population is at risk. Although several diagnostic methods are now available to detect the infection, more sensitive and applicable tests are still required in the field. The loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method is a DNA amplification tool in which the DNA amplification can be achieved by incubation at a stable temperature. A malaria detection kit based on this methodology has already been commercialized and is being used in some countries. The kit includes two reaction tubes: one targeting the common Plasmodium genus (Pan tube) and the other specifically targeting Plasmodium falciparum (Pf tube). In parallel, a simple DNA extraction method, the procedure for ultra rapid extraction (PURE), which can produce a DNA solution suitable for the LAMP reaction without the use of a centrifuge, has also become available. In this study, the sensitivity of the combination of the PURE and LAMP methods (PURE-LAMP) was evaluated with archived dried clinical blood samples of imported malaria cases, including P. falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, Plasmodium ovale, and Plasmodium malariae.

resultsUsing a nested PCR as the reference, 117 samples including 46 P. falciparum, 7 P. vivax, 9 P. ovale, 4 P. malariae, and 51 negative cases were tested. The PURE-LAMP Pan correctly identified 64 of the 66 positives and the 51 negatives. Among the Pan-positive samples 45 P. falciparum were also detected with the PURE-LAMP Pf. The PURE-LAMP Pan and PURE-LAMP Pf had respective sensitivities of 96.96% (95% CI 89.47-99.63) and 97.82% (95% CI 88.47-99.94) and common specificity of 1.

conclusionThe PURE-LAMP system is accurate when used with dried blood spots and extendable to the field.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Tests, RoutineHumansMalariaMalaria, FalciparumMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPlasmodiumPlasmodium falciparumSensitivity and SpecificityDried blood spots (DBS)Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)Malaria diagnosisNested PCRProcedure for ultra rapid extraction (PURE)

Identifiers

PMID30348162
PMCPMC6196555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.