Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30347764›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2018

Dyslexia as a Neurodevelopmental Disorder and What Makes It Different from a Chess Disorder.

Gorka FragaGonzález, Iliana I Karipidis, Jurgen Tijms

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Silent versus Reading Out Loud modes: An eye-tracking study.Journal of eye movement research · 2021
    Article
  8. (Swiss) GraphoLearn: an app-based tool to support beginning readers.Research and practice in technology enhanced learning · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gorka FragaGonzálezDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands. gorka.fragagonzalez@uzh.ch.
Iliana I KaripidisDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Zurich, CH-8006 Zurich, Switzerland. iliana.karipidis@kjpd.uzh.ch.
Jurgen TijmsDepartment of Developmental Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jurgentijms@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9080-8569

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convenience of referring to dyslexia as a neurodevelopmental disorder has been repeatedly brought into question. In this opinion article, we argue in favor of the current diagnosis of dyslexia based on the criteria of harm and dysfunction. We discuss the favorable clinical and educational outcomes of a neuroscience-informed approach of dyslexia as a disorder. Furthermore, we discuss insights derived from neuroimaging studies and their importance to address problems related to developmental dyslexia.

Indexed as

disorderdyslexianeurodevelopmental

Identifiers

PMID30347764
PMCPMC6209961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.