Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30347666›Full record

ReviewJournal of developmental biology2018

Drosophila as a Model for Developmental Biology: Stem Cell-Fate Decisions in the Developing Nervous System.

Katherine Harding, Kristin White

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Insects · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. eLife · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Astrocyte development-More questions than answers.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Dysregulation of BMP, Wnt, and Insulin Signaling in Fragile X Syndrome.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Mitochondrial Control of Stem Cell State and Fate: Lessons FromFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katherine HardingMassachusetts General Hospital Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Kristin WhiteMassachusetts General Hospital Cutaneous Biology Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02129, USA. Kristin.white@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

The regulation of cell death in vivoR01GM110477 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WHITE, KRISTIN, ZHOU, LEI · 2015 to 2018
$1.4M
Life and death decisions in Drosophila neural stem cellsR03NS092063 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WHITE, KRISTIN · 2015 to 2016
$174k
National Institutes of Health R01GM110477National Institutes of Health R03NS092063NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM110477NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS092063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stem cells face a diversity of choices throughout their lives. At specific times, they may decide to initiate cell division, terminal differentiation, or apoptosis, or they may enter a quiescent non-proliferative state. Neural stem cells in the

Indexed as

apoptosiscell cycledevelopmentDrosophilaneuroblaststem cell biology

Identifiers

PMID30347666
PMCPMC6315890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.