ArticleMedical physics2019
Fast technetium-99m liver SPECT for evaluation of the pretreatment procedure for radioembolization dosimetry.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- An international phantom study of inter-site variability in Technetium-99m image quantification: analyses from the TARGET radioembolization study.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- CT texture features and lung shunt fraction measured usingScientific reports · 2023Article
- Convex optimization algorithms in medical image reconstruction-in the age of AI.Physics in medicine and biology · 2022Review
- A compact and mobile hybrid C-arm scanner for simultaneous nuclear and fluoroscopic image guidance.European radiology · 2022Article
- EANM dosimetry committee series on standard operational procedures: a unified methodology forEJNMMI physics · 2021Article
- Technical Note: Nuclear imaging with an x-ray flat panel detector: A proof-of-concept study.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Adaptive scan duration in SPECT: Evaluation for radioembolization.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Review
- Respiratory motion compensation in interventional liver SPECT using simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear imaging.Medical physics · 2019Article
- Accelerated SPECT image reconstruction with FBP and an image enhancement convolutional neural network.EJNMMI physics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe efficiency of radioembolization procedures could be greatly enhanced if results of the
methodsSPECT liver images of the 150-MBq
resultsSimulations showed no substantial change in image quality and dosimetry by usage of a nonuniform projection-time acquisition protocol. Upon shortening acquisition times, CNR dropped, but ARC, T/N ratio, and LSF estimates were stable across all simulated acquisition times. Results of the physical phantom were in agreement with those of the simulations.
conclusionBoth uniform and nonuniform projection-time acquisition liver SPECT protocols yield accurate dosimetric metrics for radioembolization treatment planning in the interventional suite within 10 min, without compromising image quality. Consequently, fast quantitative SPECT of the liver in the interventional suite is feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.