Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30347122›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2019

Insights from in vivo micro-CT analysis: testing the hydraulic vulnerability segmentation in Acer pseudoplatanus and Fagus sylvatica seedlings.

Adriano Losso, Andreas Bär, Birgit Dämon, Christian Dullin, Andrea Ganthaler, Francesco Petruzzellis, Tadeja Savi, Giuliana Tromba, Andrea Nardini, Stefan Mayr and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Detecting and Quantifying Xylem Embolism by Synchrotron-Based X-Ray Micro-CT.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Adriano LossoDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwarterstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.
Andreas BärDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwarterstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.
Birgit DämonDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwarterstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.
Christian DullinInstitute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, Göttingen, 37075, Germany.
Andrea GanthalerDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwarterstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.
Francesco PetruzzellisDipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, Trieste, 34127, Italy.
Tadeja SaviDepartment of Crop Sciences, Division of Viticulture and Pomology, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, Konrad Lorenzstrasse 24, Tulln, A-3430, Austria.
Giuliana TrombaElettra-Sincrotrone Trieste, Area Science Park, Trieste, Basovizza, 34149, Italy.
Andrea NardiniDipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Trieste, Via L. Giorgieri 10, Trieste, 34127, Italy.
Stefan MayrDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwarterstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.
Barbara BeikircherDepartment of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Sternwarterstrasse 15, Innsbruck, A-6020, Austria.
Universität Innsbruck · ATUniversity of Trieste · ITBOKU University · ATElettra-Sincrotrone Trieste S.C.p.A. · ITMax Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine · DE

Funding

Austrian Science Fund P29896-B22Austrian Science Fund T667-B16Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29896Austrian Science Fund FWF T 667Bundesministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft SPA 05/017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The seedling stage is the most susceptible one during a tree's life. Water relations may be crucial for seedlings due to their small roots, limited water buffers and the effects of drought on water transport. Despite obvious relevance, studies on seedling xylem hydraulics are scarce as respective methodical approaches are limited. Micro-CT scans of intact Acer pseudoplatanus and Fagus sylvatica seedlings dehydrated to different water potentials (Ψ) allowed the simultaneous observation of gas-filled versus water-filled conduits and the calculation of percentage loss of conductivity (PLC) in stems, roots and leaves (petioles or main veins). Additionally, anatomical analyses were performed and stem PLC measured with hydraulic techniques. In A. pseudoplatanus, petioles showed a higher Ψ at 50% PLC (Ψ

Indexed as

AcerFagusPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant StemsSeedlingsSpecies SpecificityX-Ray MicrotomographyXylembeech (Fagus sylvatica)embolismhydraulic vulnerability segmentationmaple (Acer pseudoplatanus)seedlingssynchrotronX-ray phase contrast micro-tomography (micro-CT)xylem

Identifiers

PMID30347122
PMCPMC6492020
OpenAlexW2897237661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.