Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30347035›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2019

Deformation of Transvaginal Mesh in Response to Multiaxial Loading.

William R Barone, Katrina M Knight, Pamela A Moalli, Steven D Abramowitch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William R BaroneMusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 405 Center for Bioengineering, 300 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 e-mail: .
Katrina M KnightMusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, , 300 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 e-mail: .
Pamela A MoalliMagee-Womens Research Institute, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 e-mail: .
Steven D AbramowitchMusculoskeletal Research Center, Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 405 Center for Bioengineering, 300 Technology Drive, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; Magee-Womens Research Institute, 204 Craft Avenue, Lab A320, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 e-mail.

Funding

Building Research Careers in Women's HealthK12HD043441 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI SADOVSKY, YOEL · 2002 to 2023
$10.1M
Porosity and tensioning: Critical factors to consider when choosing a prolapse meshR01HD083383 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ABRAMOWITCH, STEVEN D, MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2016 to 2025
$5.5M
IMPACT OF MENOPAUSE ON VAGINAL CONNECTIVE TISSUE SUPPORTR01HD045590 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MOALLI, PAMELA A. · 2004 to 2008
$1.4M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD043441NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD045590NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083383
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair is associated with high complication rates. While current devices incorporate large pores (>1 mm), recent studies have shown that uniaxial loading of mesh reduces pore size, raising the risk for complications. However, it is difficult to translate uniaxial results to transvaginal meshes, as in vivo loading is multidirectional. Thus, the aim of this study was to (1) experimentally characterize deformation of pore diameters in a transvaginal mesh in response to clinically relevant multidirectional loading and (2) develop a computational model to simulate mesh behavior in response to in vivo loading conditions. Tension (2.5 N) was applied to each of mesh arm to simulate surgical implantation. Two loading conditions were assessed where the angle of the applied tension was altered and image analysis was used to quantify changes in pore dimensions. A computational model was developed and used to simulate pore behavior in response to these same loading conditions and the results were compared to experimental findings. For both conditions, between 26.4% and 56.6% of all pores were found to have diameters <1 mm. Significant reductions in pore diameter were noted in the inferior arms and between the two superior arms. The computational model identified the same regions, though the model generally underestimated pore deformation. This study demonstrates that multiaxial loading applied clinically has the potential to locally reduce porosity in transvaginal mesh, increasing the risk for complications. Computational simulations show potential of predicting this behavior for more complex loading conditions.

Indexed as

Materials TestingSurgical MeshVaginaComputer SimulationFemaleHumansPelvic Organ ProlapsePorosityWeight-Bearing

Identifiers

PMID30347035
PMCPMC6298528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.