Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30346949›Full record

Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2018

Field safety and effectiveness of new visceral leishmaniasis treatment regimens within public health facilities in Bihar, India.

Vishal Goyal, Raman Mahajan, Krishna Pandey, Shambhu Nath Singh, Ravi Shankar Singh, Nathalie Strub-Wourgaft, Fabiana Alves, Vidya Nand Rabi Das, Roshan Kamal Topno, Bhawna Sharma and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Leishmaniasis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Effectiveness of Single-Dose Liposomal Amphotericin B in Visceral Leishmaniasis in Bihar.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Vishal GoyalDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0003-3564-129X
Raman MahajanMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), New Delhi, India.
Krishna PandeyDivision of Clinical Medicine, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (RMRI), New Delhi, India.
Shambhu Nath SinghSadar Hospital Chapra, Saran, India.
Ravi Shankar SinghSadar Hospital Chapra, Saran, India.
Nathalie Strub-WourgaftDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Fabiana AlvesDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Vidya Nand Rabi DasDivision of Clinical Medicine, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (RMRI), New Delhi, India.
Roshan Kamal TopnoDivision of Clinical Medicine, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (RMRI), New Delhi, India.
Bhawna SharmaDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), New Delhi, India.
Manica BalasegaramDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Caryn BernDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco CA, United States of America.
Allen HightowerIndependent consultant, Bangkok, Thailand.
Suman RijalDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), New Delhi, India.
Sally EllisDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Temmy SunyotoMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), New Delhi, India.
Sakib BurzaMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), New Delhi, India.
Nines LimaMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Barcelona, Spain.
Pradeep DasDivision of Clinical Medicine, Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences (RMRI), New Delhi, India.
Jorge AlvarDrugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi), Geneva, Switzerland.
Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHRajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences · INDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative India · INBangkok University · THMédecins Sans Frontières · ESUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2010, WHO recommended the use of new short-course treatment regimens in kala-azar elimination efforts for the Indian subcontinent. Although phase 3 studies have shown excellent results, there remains a lack of evidence on a wider treatment population and the safety and effectiveness of these regimens under field conditions.

methodsThis was an open label, prospective, non-randomized, non-comparative, multi-centric trial conducted within public health facilities in two highly endemic districts and a specialist referral centre in Bihar, India. Three treatment regimens were tested: single dose AmBisome (SDA), concomitant miltefosine and paromomycin (Milt+PM), and concomitant AmBisome and miltefosine (AmB+Milt). Patients with complicated disease or significant co-morbidities were treated in the SDA arm. Sample sizes were set at a minimum of 300 per arm, taking into account inter-site variation and an estimated failure risk of 5% with 5% precision. Outcomes of drug effectiveness and safety were measured at 6 months. The trial was prospectively registered with the Clinical Trials Registry India: CTRI/2012/08/002891.

resultsOut of 1,761 patients recruited, 50.6% (n = 891) received SDA, 20.3% (n = 358) AmB+Milt and 29.1% (n = 512) Milt+PM. In the ITT analysis, the final cure rates were SDA 91.4% (95% CI 89.3-93.1), AmB+Milt 88.8% (95% CI 85.1-91.9) and Milt+PM 96.9% (95% CI 95.0-98.2). In the complete case analysis, cure rates were SDA 95.5% (95% CI 93.9-96.8), AmB+Milt 95.5% (95% CI 92.7-97.5) and Milt+PM 99.6% (95% CI 98.6-99.9). All three regimens were safe, with 5 severe adverse events in the SDA arm, two of which were considered to be drug related.

conclusionAll regimens showed acceptable outcomes and safety profiles in a range of patients under field conditions. Phase IV field-based studies, although extremely rare for neglected tropical diseases, are good practice and an important step in validating the results of more restrictive hospital-based studies before widespread implementation, and in this case contributed to national level policy change in India.

trial registrationClinical trial is registered at Clinical trial registry of India (CTRI/2012/08/002891, Registered on 16/08/2012, Trial Registered Prospectively).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIndiaLeishmaniasis, VisceralMaleMiddle AgedAmphotericin BAntiprotozoal Agentsliposomal amphotericin BmiltefosineParomomycinPhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID30346949
PMCPMC6197645
OpenAlexW2896600605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.